Will 3DMark07 be a popular benchmark tool?

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Shtal, Dec 23, 2006.

  1. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
    Just wondering if 3DMark07 will make users to switch to vista just to play with new benchmark.

    I know Microsoft is waiting so bad for DX10 title games in order to sell more vista copy's of OS.
     
  2. BByte

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    3DMark07 requires DX10. DX10 requires Windows Vista. Therefore 3DMark07 requires Windows Vista.
     
    #102 BByte, May 13, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: May 13, 2007
  3. Sobek

    Sobek Locally Operating
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,774
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    QLD, Australia
    For a day, sure. Then those with their sanity intact will switch back to XP pronto :lol:
     
  4. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
    You misunderstood me, all I meant what you just reply!
    The question was will people spent their money on the vista-OS to play for short/long time with 3DMark07.
     
  5. BByte

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    2
    Doh, so it was indeed. And no, I'd guess not that many will switch to Vista just to use the latest 3DMark. So the Vista requirement could very well make it a less popular benchmark at least at the beginning.
     
  6. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4
    3DMark Next system requirements revealed

    Say what you will about 3DMark's accuracy or viability as a synthetic gaming test, the application is still very widely used, and its merits with respect to strict graphics processor testing are evident. However, the latest version of the tool, 3DMark06, came out close to two years ago and lacks DirectX 10 effects being used by games today.

    Futuremark is therefore working on a new version of the tool, which will drop the yearly naming scheme and go by "3DMark Next." As what might be considered a teaser for the new app, the company has released minimum system specifications for 3DMark Next in the Game-O-Meter section of its YouGamers website. Those minimum specs are as follows:

    Processor: x86/x64 single core CPU with SSE2 support. Performance similar to Intel Pentium D 3.2GHz or better.
    Display Card: Fully D3D10/SM4.0 compliant graphics card, 256MB
    Memory: 1024MB
    Free Disk Space: 2GB
    Operating System: Windows Vista (Server editions not supported)

    And Futuremark lists the following as recommended:

    Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 or equivalent AMD CPU.
    Display Card: Fully D3D10/SM4.0 compliant graphics card, 512MB
    Memory: 2048MB
    Free Disk Space: 2GB
    Operating System: Windows Vista (Server editions not supported)

    As Futuremark announced back in April, 3DMark Next will say goodbye to DirectX 9-class graphics processors and Windows XP, supporting only the latest GeForce 8- and Radeon HD-series GPUs running on Vista. Processor and memory requirements seem to be quite steep, as well, with a Core 2 Duo E6600 or equivalent and 2GB of RAM recommended. Following Futuremark's custom, the upcoming benchmark will probably reflect the graphical capabilities of upcoming games more than those of already-released titles. http://www.techreport.com/news.x
     
  7. Kowan

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    Of course it's still widely used. People want to see how well a card performs on 3DMark even though drivers are written to boost that score when it doesn't show up in actual games.
    Lets hope the newer version is closer to how the card will handle the games.

    I used to "play" 3DMark. Doing crazy stuff to my hardware trying to boost my score. Until I found out through PM's by cheaters how they were leaving me in the dust score wise on 3DMark 2001.
     
  8. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4

    3DMark2001 was the last benchmark which used actual real game engine (Even "3DMark Engine" it was never used in real game)

    *all newer 3DMark is crap! " In 3DMark05 Radeon HD2600PRO 650GPU/1100mem 128bit ----> scores higher then ATi Radeon X800XT 500GPU/1000mem 256bit

    But cheating scores is not something new.
     
    #108 Shtal, Oct 25, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 25, 2007
  9. Geo

    Geo Mostly Harmless
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,116
    Likes Received:
    215
    Location:
    Uffda-land
    Wow, it's nearly November. Should we start calling this 3DM08 at this point?
     
  10. pjbliverpool

    pjbliverpool B3D Scallywag
    Legend

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    9,246
    Likes Received:
    4,274
    Location:
    Guess...
    Thats more related to the fact that the HD2600 supports SM3 while th X800XT doesn't. That said, I wouldn;t have thought the HD2600 would be particularly slower than the X800XT anyway.
     
  11. Spaceman-Spiff

    Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    .bc.ca
    No!! It will get released on Dec 31, 2007, I tell you!! :razz:
     
  12. Pete

    Pete Moderate Nuisance
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    5,779
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Has the name changed to 3DMark Next, as TR reported YG posted, or is that just a code name? I can't tell who's inferring or stating fact here, though TR's news piece sounds like the latter.

    Nick promises pics RSN, whatever it'll be called.
     
  13. IbaneZ

    Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2003
    Messages:
    743
    Likes Received:
    17
    I don't trust that guy, he's been saying soon all year. :lol:
     
  14. Lux_

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    1
    Very true:cool:
    They may as well delay it a bit longer and make some tests for DX10.1.
    And throw in a "run once" lock like rencent PCMark has, just for giggles :smile:.
     
  15. Shtal

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    4

    :lol: It will be 3DMark07SE (Second Edition). Example like 3DMark2001 then 3DMark2001SE added SM1.4 support. :smile:
     
  16. Quitch

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    UK
    People consider this relevant? WTF?? Are we still in 2003 or something?
     
  17. Nick[FM]

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Helsinki
    Hehe.. I know! :oops: But this time I mean it. :wink:

    Cheers,

    Nick
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...