On the McLuhan scale, it is a 'hot' idea.xbdestroya said:Anyway I think it's a 'cool' idea;
xbdestroya said:Well if you acknowledge you were defending it against 'skeptics,' then you already know you're not the first to come to this realization.
Anyway I think it's a 'cool' idea; like many GameCube games at the moment, I think it's greatest utility will be in party/group settings though.
Beyond that, frankly I just think motion-induced gameplay will grow tiring into the second... third... fourth hour of gaming...
Magnum PI said:on one side i think this controller will be terrific for some games.
one the other side i'm afraid to see some kind of extremely simplified gameplay which could be too limited. some sort of interactivity which doesn't require any real skill, you think you are an actor but you're only a puppet.
and some regression: games which would have been better on a classic gamepad that will instead play with the magic wand..
all in all i guess i think if i choose to go the wii route i'll just have to avoid some games..
What comfort factor do you mean? Long loading times and noisier drives?nintenho said:Yeah, I actually prefer a 360. It just seems more useful. I'm saying that the biggest problem with PS3 is going to be the comfort factor. Will the maniac fans be happier buying a Wii and a 360 because of this, probably but I honestly have hate for sony making a system that expensive. It's so...unorthodox for a videogame system.
the price....oh, you were being sarcastic. I guess the next system will come in 2012-13. Wii might be a handheld?one said:What comfort factor do you mean? Long loading times and noisier drives?
BTW, when do you think will Nintendo release the next system after Wii?