This reminds me of a funny little device my friend bought nearly 10 years ago
It's a Sony notebook, but it's very small. Its display is only 6.4", but @ 1024x768, that makes it ~ 200 dpi. Unfortunately, Windows XP does not support high DPI properly (nor is 1024x768 enough for anything like that). Of course, it's very expensive. IIRC he paid around NT$50k for that. I think that's more than US$1,500.
Speaking of color gamut, I recently found that my iPad 2's display is more close to sRGB than my iPhone 4 (my iPhone 4 is a little bit "yellowish"). Then I found that some (but not all) iPad 3 also has this "yellow-tint" problem. It's too bad that Apple doesn't support color management in iOS. Personally I think if Apple don't want to support color management in iOS for whatever reason, it's their duty to make sure all their devices look roughly the same under its device color profile. I mean, Apple used to be popular in desktop publishing market, this is something I expect them to do well.
Anyway, I'm still eager to buy an iPad 3, but I'll wait for its official release here. Maybe some little bugs will get fixed.
While some might actually have a yellow tint problem, a lot are simply not used to seeing warmer/calibrated displays and thus are complaining. You have to be careful in assessing the problem.
As someone who likes properly calibrated displays, I'm very happy to see Apple do such a good job with image quality out of the box.
Now of if we could g the rest of the CE industry (esp TV's) to start marketing displays with proper calibration vs vivid/dynamic/retard mode.