Whoops: XB360 at 2.8GHz

Is this an inopportune moment for a joke referring to an upcoming announcement to reveal that the lower speed will be the "core" version and the higher speed will be the "deluxe" version?

 

I wonder who has not glanced over those docs... We are making a big fuss over nothing: expect 3.2 GHz chips in the retail machines (there are developers with 3.2 GHz XeCPU's, so there goes the theory ).

 

Agreed.

 

Well, if everybody has a such good insight in this file, then file is a public domain and it could be published. Can someone post the link so we can check it up?
Primary docs (like xenon white paper) explicitly talked about 3ghz cpu. I think this are the old data not in relation with alpha, beta or final dev kit. I think 2.8ghz is a production defect and MS will do recall.

 

I think the whole debate over things like this often take out the worst side in some people(READ ******S).

Although Jaweds title was a little missleading as in many thought X360 xCpu is downgraded i doubt it mather anyways.

IF the yeilds at 3.2GHz dont meet the demand MS is expecting but 3.0GHz DO then IMO the smartest move is to ship final X360 with that speed as they will still sell more and most people dont care anyways, remember they will make money and thats always a companys priority one. And lets speculate the same thing for 2.8GHz, i dont se it as bad buisness because instead of (and remember im just speculate) ship say 300K units worldwide at 3.2 or 600k worldwide at 3.0 and lastely 4MILLIONS units worldwide at 2.8.
What would you do if you were in charge? I know what i would do atleast.

Lastly IF there are any changes is this really something strange, just look at the current gen consoles and how numbers jumped both UP and DOWN at the last minute.

 

So, final CPU clock speed = 3.2GHz

 

Probably one or a couple surface-mount resistors being soldered into the wrong place, setting an incorrect multiplier. That's my guess. It doesn't seem as if the chips themselves are different, and I wouldn't expect them to be either.

 

Or someone could have grabbed a batch of pre-production sample CPU's on accident, which seems much more likely. After all, they would have done a run of lower-clock speed CPU's to test the fabrication process before they started mass producing the final CPU's. It's quite possible that they could have had a box of those pre-production samples lying around in the same area as the first final-spec chips were produced, and they may have been mixed in on accident.

 

but u could have titled thread differently

 

Slightly off-topic. Well, quite off-topic but related to the X360 Development SDKs…

How much do they cost? I think to remember someone said they were quite cheap for a SDK, but I don’t find the quote.
Is it the same price for an alpha kit than for a final version of the SDK?, or do you pay a fixed amount and receive newer versions as they are available?

Thank you.

 

The clockspeed is determined after the chip's been manufactured, during chip functionality verification. It would make no sense to fabricate lower clocked chips to test with, because they'd be completely different compared to the real chips; essentially a different product... Besides, the manufacturing process used for these chips is NOT new. In fact it's quite mature by now.

I don't see how that would have been the case. These things aren't soldered together by hand. They're built in automated plants.

Like I said, I very VERY much doubt the lower-clocked and fully-clocked machines use CPUs that are different, they probably just have different multipliers set, either on the CPU substrate or on the motherboard.

 

SDKs typically cost LOTS (50-ish K US$, maybe more I suppose), but then you also have to pass qualifications to even be allowed to buy one. I highly doubt just any guy could order a devkit, even if he/she has the money to blow on one.

 

I agree with everything here. I think some people really have an issue grasping what determines chip speed. Every chip on a revision is 'the same,' so to speak. It's what's done to the chip after the fabbing process that seperates it from it's kin.

On the issue of the SDK's, I know the price tag for the PS3 SDK's early on was $100,000 each - if it's changed any I don't know - but it's safe to say that whatver Microsoft's SDK costs, it costs a fair deal less than that.

 

I though PS3 dev kits were around $30,000?

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25855

Oops $25,000 according to the inquirer...and uh...the inquirer said it so...uhm...yeah.

 

Well, actually though I can't find any confirmation of the $100,000 figure I swore was quoted before - so who knows, maybe it is $25,000?

Oh well I'm sure someone who knows better will float by this topic and answer our questions at some point.

 

Even if it is 25k, that's hardly pocket change. I sure hope Sony follows through on the talk about Linuxing PS3, think of the scene demos you could cook up on a machine like that... Staggering!

I think it's fairly probable they'll do a hobby development environment of some kind, there's a long tradition of homebrew development with the PSes after all, starting with the Yaroze PS, then continuing on with the (way over-priced) PS2 linux kit.

Maybe a PS3 Linux system could be sort of a new starting-point for young talented programmers, like the basic prompts of the old 8-bit systems in the early 80s...

 

Have these dev kit prices been confirmed?

I was also under the impression that these prices are not something out of the ordinary.

In any case I do consider 25,000 chump change when compared to an UE3.0 license.