... not necessarily.... other factors will come into play, such as:london-boy said:The one that comes out last....
rabidrabbit said:Then, I must've imagined all those "next gen" threads, that had got ugly.
Though, lately it has been much more nicer, thank Mod!
cybamerc said:Define "powerful".
rabidrabbit said:It's very much an artist dependant thing.
Feature-rich doesent automatically equal the most beautiful.
A game using all the effects the hardware allows just for sake of showing off, will very likely look otherwise artistically disappoiniting.
Best graphics does not equal most powerful. Especially next gen where budgets will be the limiting factor.GwymWeepa said:At the end of the day, the machine capable of creating the most beautiful, feature-rich graphics.
london-boy said:It's not all about graphics. I think people need to get it into their heads that we need solid physics and animation. Shiny graphics only gets you so far.
Why do u think everyone's going for the huge CPU power first this time around...
Then you should have asked: "Which system will be able to produce the best graphics?" Not that it would be an any less silly question.GwymWeepa said:Though very important, I'd like to keep it to graphics only.
cybamerc said:Then you should have asked: "Which system will be able to produce the best graphics?" Not that it would be an any less silly question.GwymWeepa said:Though very important, I'd like to keep it to graphics only.