I try not to attack people on the internet but Arthur Gies, in the few articles I've read of his, does seem to be somebody with a chip on his shoulder. It's like he's got an axe to grind and sometimes, his current article, is the repurposed grindstone. But having had a quick scan at the Polygon review, it's clear he did little research on the game. The world which CDPR created? They are bringing to life a world created by Andrzej Sapkowski.Intersting take on the topic by Adrian Chmielarz, based on a recent lukewarm review of the highly praised Witcher 3. Or in other words: review of review.
I had one editor tell me flat-out that the site needed a boost one month, and I needed to give a big-name release a low score. He even said he’d post it before the embargo because as everyone knows, early reviews get a huge amount of attention. Plus, early reviews that have a low score for a super anticipated game get the most possible attention.
That's an excellent article, thanks for sharing it.https://medium.com/@adrianchm/the-boy-who-cried-white-wolf-on-polygon-s-the-witcher-3-review-f7ac8d7f0a5
Intersting take on the topic by Adrian Chmielarz, based on a recent lukewarm review of the highly praised Witcher 3.
Or in other words: review of review.
Very insightful and smart contribution. Many thanks to you too, you certainly saved me from ever going there again. I can't stand a place like that, and this has nothing to do with my admiration for The Witcher alone.Arthur Gies is simply doing his job.
It just so happens that his job is not to write honest reviews. His job is to generate controversy for clickbait ad revenue.
Lots of people will go to Polygon to read that review who claims the developers are sexists, mysoginists and racists. Many will post angry comments about how so very wrong he is and how much of an ass he is for his claims.
And that spike in Polygon's web hits for the week will mean that Arthur Gies did his job wonderfully.
Arthur Gies is also the same person who gave Bayonetta 2 a lower score than everyone else, calling out for the problematic sexual objectification of women in the game, because the character exists solely for the male gaze, which is demeaning for women.
Shortly after that, people found out that Arthur Gies is a big fan and >10 years financial patron of Suicide Girls (a porn website with only female models).
Just a reminder:
I keep saying this, but I'll say it again: avoid Polygon like the plague. It's a terrible website that actively hurts the industry, the consumers and the developers for the sake of clickbait.
That's an excellent article, thanks for sharing it.
Both that fact and the utter ignorance of accusing a game of whitewashing when the game is set in Poland, got my blood boiling and were the nail in the coffin. I was like... wth? Is this for real? No matter then when people accuse others of being a bit ignorant outside their borders. Where is this Gies from, I wonder?I know Witcher games and books quite well and the main theme in them was always merciless criticism of intolerance (based on dwarves/humans/elves/hobbits relations) and praise of strong women characters. In fact, I personally find feminism in the books a little too strong (and I'am my wife bitch on daily basis ). Thats why Gies review was really strange to me.
He trained an army of dinosaurs, I learned this from the documentary series Danger 5.