Universal Truths

The most prominent representatives of The World Government are financial group Rothschild - Rockefeller. At present, among them there are some disagreements in the views about the New World Order. Rothschild, including Soros, are actively promoting China as an alternative to the U.S.. Rockefeller is trying to buy time through all sorts of crises and revolutions to complete the reformatting of U.S. into a neo empire in which to enter Canada and Mexico.

;)
 
The most prominent representatives of The World Government are financial group Rothschild - Rockefeller. At present, among them there are some disagreements in the views about the New World Order. Rothschild, including Soros, are actively promoting China as an alternative to the U.S.. Rockefeller is trying to buy time through all sorts of crises and revolutions to complete the reformatting of U.S. into a neo empire in which to enter Canada and Mexico.

;)

_xxx_, welcome back.

Cheers
 
Perhaps some others have vision which you don't...

Now, instead of spreading evil comments in the thread which is otherwise for something opposite, you can comment on the aforementioned quotes. And please, be constructive, with arguments different from endless insults.

I have one for you:
Christopher Hitchens said:
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
 
xxx lost it big time and was aggressive and what not, but this is not the same dude. Despite xxx being crazy I think his IQ wasn't nearly as low as what we have here. UNI is xxx's weak disciple or poor man's xxx :)

I know, he's not the same guy. :)

The Rotchschild-Rockefeller conspiracy nonsense just gave me flash backs

Cheers
 
Hint: The idea is clear. To kill the diverse competition and create a market dictated by few, in monopoly.
I don't see why that would be the case. A single network does NOT imply a single (or a few) service providers. Sweden, unlike the US, allows *DSL internet service providers to buy access to the publically owned and run copper wire phone network, and we have many smaller ISPs in addition to the company that actually owns the phone network.

Roaming is a big issue in europe (which as you probably recall, is ~50 - mostly midget-sized - nations), where people have racked up charges in the amounts of thousands of dollars (sometimes tens of thousands) over the course of a few days on vacation in a foreign country. The EU has taken some strides to limit these amounts, but it's not really enough. Companies are still allowed to vastly and grossly overcharge foreigners for data in this day and age. It really puts a cramp in smartphone users' style when travelling.
 
A comment I like:

Stupid TV commentators. having strolled into the quarters without dropping a set all they have to say about Murray is "he hasn't hit his best form". Idiots. In the Melbourne heat, when he's winning so easily, do you actually think he needs to extend even more energy striving for his "best form", when second best is winning so easily?? Maybe conserving energy is not such a bad thing in 90 degree plus heat.

http://eurosport.yahoo.com/news/aus...-past-simon-melbourne-quarters-084442760.html

So much truth. And the quality of TV commentators is terrifying. :mrgreen:
 
"- Which way to go from here? - said Alice.
- It depends where you want to get, responses Smiling cat.
- Never mind, said Alice.
- Then it does not matter which path you take, Cat smiled enigmatically.
- ...as long as I get somewhere, Alice added.
- Oh, this will surely happen, said the Cat, as long as you walk long enough."


Lewis Carroll

http://www.dreamthisday.com/quotes-sayings/alice/
 
The moon hoax conspiracy theorists are not just a wacky bunch of people, but also quite bizarre. Why are they so obsessed with trying to prove that we could NOT do something, which we could in fact demonstratably do, back in 1969? I don't get it, what's the point in that?

I mean, most conspiracy theorists obsess over things that were alledgedly done, or alledgedly happened, be it UFO abductions, WTC collapses or JFK shootings and so on. You generally don't often find conspiracy theorists who claim that something did NOT happen. AFAIK, the moon landings are pretty unique in that regard.

And it's such a stupid conspiracy theory anyway, because most aspects of the moon landings can be paired down to physics which almost anyone with proper education can understand, and calculate themselves. Be it launching a rocket, with a certain amount of thrust, fuel capacity, weight and payload mass and so on, to orbital mechanics involving various docking manoeuvers and so on, keeping three guys alive for x number of days with the amount of consumables you could bring with you on the voyage and so on.

Most, if not all the blueprints and so on are public documents these days, there's even hardware preserved that can be observed, measured. These vehicles worked. We saw them launch into space. Yet people claim they didn't. That's stupid. I don't get why conspiracy theorists work so hard at trying to prove that people are stupider and less capable than we really in fact are.
 
Speaking of the moon hoax, I just ran across this video:


The punchline:
It was fundamentally impossible for them to have faked the moon landing videos through slow motion in 1969, as the camera technology just wasn't there at that time.
 
...The favourite show of Yull Brown was to cover 1600 km by car with a drum full of 4 liters of water only and two Brown motion batteries which convert water into gas. Brown gas is produced by electrolysis of water in which hydrogen and oxygen are separated. This is nothing new or complicated- electrolysis was discovered nearly two centuries ago by Faraday. What is new is that when the two gases are mixed, even under pressure, they don't explode but connect peacefully and silently. "From water to water with clean energy that can purify water, air, food, generally the world." That's how Brown formulates his own discovery...
 
Now you're just plain trolling. You need to do better, nobody's going to buy that you actually believe it's possible to run cars on WATER. You might as well try to peddle the idea we can run steam boilers in powerplants on wood ashes, it's basically the same thing.

There's a reason you only hear about kooky shit like this second- or third-hand on the internet and never see it yourself in the real world, and that's because it doesn't work. Never has and never will. This "Yull Brown" whomever the shit that is, is a liar and a fraud. It doesn't even take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.
 
Back
Top