Thought this discussion might be fun to break out of the youtube thread. I wouldn't want to wreck it - even though it has grown rather obnoxiously large by now.
...Assuming you're not simply trolling of course. This is a distinct possibility I admit, and hopefully that is indeed the case, as otherwise you'd have to be a complete idiot, considering the nonsense you've already spouted.
The artifacts left from past expeditions are still there on the moon's surface, as are all the tracks left in the soil. We can see them with the Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter probe, which is currently orbiting the moon. There are also laser reflectors sitting on the surface, left there by the astronauts, which we use all the time in science experiments.
So your view that we didn't go there because we couldn't is pretty much completely bogus I'm afraid, and you're an ignorant fool for believing the way you do.
May I remind you, that people have spent half a year if not longer aboard various space stations orbiting our planet; the moonlanding astronauts were only in space for a week and a half, roughly.
What "New" age is it you expect to begin then? ...Other than the calendar year 2013, of course.
Holy crap man. That this planet is round has been known since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, if not even earlier than that. In the modern era it's absolutely indisputable that it is in fact round, since we've circumnavigated the globe using airplanes, spacecraft and such whilst photo-documenting everything.
That the earth is round can also be proven by things like beyond line-of-sight radio transmissions and other methods.
There's a distinct difference about not believing media and gov't bullshit, and unquestioningly swallowing non-media and non-gov't bullshit, like you are.
...Assuming you're not simply trolling of course. This is a distinct possibility I admit, and hopefully that is indeed the case, as otherwise you'd have to be a complete idiot, considering the nonsense you've already spouted.
What exactly would you say was lacking, technology-wise, to send people to the moon in the late 60s and early 70s? Considering that we tracked the lunar lander actually LANDING on the moon, and triangulated the astronauts' voices coming from there, I don't get why anyone would say we didn't have the tech to go there when we in fact did go there.
The artifacts left from past expeditions are still there on the moon's surface, as are all the tracks left in the soil. We can see them with the Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter probe, which is currently orbiting the moon. There are also laser reflectors sitting on the surface, left there by the astronauts, which we use all the time in science experiments.
So your view that we didn't go there because we couldn't is pretty much completely bogus I'm afraid, and you're an ignorant fool for believing the way you do.
How intense is that radiation, do you believe?
May I remind you, that people have spent half a year if not longer aboard various space stations orbiting our planet; the moonlanding astronauts were only in space for a week and a half, roughly.
"Difficult", how? What would be so difficult about it? We have all the tech needed, we've had it for half a century now.
Err... It's not mainstream media that claims the world will end in december this year.False, then we can expect the beginning of a New age, not like the mainstream media tries to disinform and confuse us that it would be the end...
What "New" age is it you expect to begin then? ...Other than the calendar year 2013, of course.
The media was forced to believe that the earth is flat? The enlightened know that it's false that the earth is round, is that what you're saying?
Holy crap man. That this planet is round has been known since at least the time of the ancient Greeks, if not even earlier than that. In the modern era it's absolutely indisputable that it is in fact round, since we've circumnavigated the globe using airplanes, spacecraft and such whilst photo-documenting everything.
That the earth is round can also be proven by things like beyond line-of-sight radio transmissions and other methods.
Perhaps there's a language barrier present here, but if you are saying what I think you're saying, you're a complete retard. Sorry! It's true, though.Actually there are many examples from history when the arrogant bourgeois didn't want to let a given knowledge reach the masses.
Only because it is complex? 