Universal Truths

Which is a mind-bogglingly bizarre and whacky theory. Yeesh. What do these people use for brains?

Have you ever heard about science-fiction. Yes, they have rather rich imagination, they are open-minded, think out of the box, which is far more different than the usual mainstream science thinking :LOL:
BTW, many of the things happening today were considered as science-fiction perhaps not so long time ago. :mrgreen:
 
Have you ever heard about science-fiction. Yes, they have rather rich imagination, they are open-minded, think out of the box, which is far more different than the usual mainstream science thinking :LOL:
Well, yes, mainstream science fiction tends to all to often think outside the box....of reality, coming up with things like sound in space.
 
Yes, I read lots and lots of science fiction. Some SF is excellent and thought provoking, other SF is less so. However, most modern stuff is based in current scientific understanding. The key word here is, "fiction".

I doubt that any serious SF is as risible as a conspiracy theory which thinks that the not overly large meteor which exploded over Tunguska would have destroyed the Earth had it not been for the intervention of Alien Fairy Godmothers. It's so far beyond stupid, it's almost untrue.

You're talking about a sub-Abrams-level story here, something I didn't know was actually possible. :)
 
BTW, many of the things happening today were considered as science-fiction perhaps not so long time ago. :mrgreen:

Christ how many times have I read this on the internet to justify bullshit made-up nonsense?!

Scientific understanding evolves. There are limits to current scientific understanding, and there are gaps in current scientific understanding. This doesn't mean that you get to make shit up to fill in those gaps and pass it off as "well it could be true, science doesn't know everything"!!

The gaps need to be filled in with stuff that is, you know... actually true. The point of filling in the gaps is to advance the state of human knowledge, not to cause wide-spread brain-damage to other people on the internet.

Please stop banging on about being open-minded too. I dare say you've heard the old saying - don't open your mind so far that your brains fall out??
 
Yes, I read lots and lots of science fiction. Some SF is excellent and thought provoking, other SF is less so. However, most modern stuff is based in current scientific understanding. The key word here is, "fiction".
Well, that's partially why I specified, "mainstream." Mainstream sci-fi can be fun, but tends to be complete crap when it comes to scientific accuracy. This isn't unique to sci-fi, of course, as the Mythbusters have shown again and again: movie physics is typically really, really bad.

One of the main problems is that some early production starts with some really bad movie physics (such as sound in space, or a person getting thrown backward by a bullet), and then others copy the mistake and before long the mistake is ubiquitous and very few notice that there's even a realism issue to be had.

I think books have this problem much less, in part because they aren't limited by the need to visually show what is going on in print (a lot of bad movie physics comes from the movie makers' attempts to simply make the visual representation entertaining). The barrier to entry for books is also much lower, and the readership is generally expected to be much more intelligent and interested in the subject. So you both have more authors, allowing for more creativity and breaking of norms, and also a readership that rewards them for good science.
 
I was actually really responding to UT and his latest nonsense but, for regular 'popcorn' SF movies I don't really mind things such as sound in space to much. I just imagine that the sound of phasers/lasers/etc. is just the feedback the pilots hear from their energy systems. If they can hear the sounds produced by attacking spacecraft, surely that's just an aspect of their HUD informing them they are under fire?

:)
 
His clothes would certainly hang weird on him, though. He'd continually look like he was shrugging his shoulders...

No problem, he'd just need to buy new clothes on the new planet.

But paying for the clothes might be difficult, as the two planets presumably use different currencies. Plus, any money from his planet that he might put down on the counter would "fall" up.
 
In some american forums it was described how there is a whole organisation of people who write (for money) in forums so as they tilt the balance in advantageous for the powers direction.

BTW, it is quite noticeable here on this forum. :LOL:
 
In some american forums it was described how there is a whole organisation of people who write (for money) in forums so as they tilt the balance in advantageous for the powers direction.

BTW, it is quite noticeable here on this forum. :LOL:

I remember Techreport did an article on it not that long ago where the accusation appeared to be that Nvidia shills were up to no good on their forum.

That wasn't the first time either - http://consumerist.com/2006/02/06/did-nvidia-hire-online-actors-to-promote-their-products/

Chiphell was the start of another problem reported on [H] - http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1668756

Anandtech is run by Intel people.

If you think B3D is like those then you're wrong btw.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No problem, he'd just need to buy new clothes on the new planet.
Ahhh, but then the burning part comes in: matter in contact with matter from the other world burns after a bit. I imagine it wouldn't be so great to have burns all over his body from wearing clothes from the other world.

But paying for the clothes might be difficult, as the two planets presumably use different currencies. Plus, any money from his planet that he might put down on the counter would "fall" up.
True :) It would require help from a confederate on the other side, or some form of trade with somebody on the other side.
 
I remember Techreport did an article on it not that long ago where the accusation appeared to be that Nvidia shills were up to no good on their forum.

That wasn't the first time either - http://consumerist.com/2006/02/06/did-nvidia-hire-online-actors-to-promote-their-products/

Chiphell was the start of another problem reported on [H] - http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1668756

Anandtech is run by Intel people.

If you think B3D is like those then you're wrong btw.
Hmmm, the post link in that article doesn't work. Here's the correct one, from the late ChrisRay:
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=691810&postcount=575
 
Ahhh, but then the burning part comes in: matter in contact with matter from the other world burns after a bit. I imagine it wouldn't be so great to have burns all over his body from wearing clothes from the other world.

Damn, I missed that. But then how does he even walk on the ground? Or sleep? Or have any kind of lasting contact with the girl he's doing all of this for in the first place, for that matter?

I almost want to see the movie, now.
 
Damn, I missed that. But then how does he even walk on the ground? Or sleep? Or have any kind of lasting contact with the girl he's doing all of this for in the first place, for that matter?

I almost want to see the movie, now.
My understanding is that it takes a little while, and he has to go back when his weights start to burn. But either way, it really sounds like this movie handled the mechanics incredibly inconsistently.
 
My understanding is that it takes a little while, and he has to go back when his weights start to burn. But either way, it really sounds like this movie handled the mechanics incredibly inconsistently.

I see. That's what happens when you come up with ridiculous mechanics: at some point they break down, no matter how hard you may try to make it work.

I always thought that was one of Star Wars' strengths: there's a lot of crazy tech in the SW universe, but ultimately the mechanics are pretty straightforward, easy to understand, and consistent.

More importantly, they don't get in the way of—or worse, replace—the plot; unlike some SciFi movies or shows where the protagonists are facing some kind of insurmountable technological obstacle for 90% of the duration of the movie/episode, until someone blurts out something along the lines of:

"But of course! The killer nanites are interconnected using a sub-space auto-adapting peer-to-peer communication network, so I didn't think there was any way to break it down. But it turns out that these communications generate synchronous fluctuations in their power cores, so all we have to do is adjust our power generator to their frequency to make its EM field resonate with their power cores and overload them! If all goes well, they'll explode. But it's going to be very difficult, I'll have to do it manually*. This convenient gauge on my console's screen will allow you to monitor how tightly I'm adjusting the frequency, and this other convenient gauge will show how close I am to overloading their power cores. Hopefully I can do it before they kill us all, which you'll be able to tell from the vocal countdown to the final breach of hull integrity that our central computer is making."


*The faster and the less humanly doable some operation is, the more likely you are to have to do it manually.
 
More importantly, they don't get in the way of—or worse, replace—the plot; unlike some SciFi movies or shows where the protagonists are facing some kind of insurmountable technological obstacle for 90% of the duration of the movie/episode, until someone blurts out something along the lines of:
Heck, how about just pulling out your macbook to give the mothership a computer virus, thus making it drop its inpenetrable invulnerability forcefields for no logical reason whatsoever? ;)

Anyway, you just quoted 50% of all Star Trek episodes ever made word-for-word, roughly. :)
 
You know, what pisses me off especially with Star Wars Episode I is that the wee boy destroys a small mothership and instantly, thousands of droids drop dead on the planet.

This would be like my computer freezing to death if Beyond3D comes down. Really, one of the major plot turning points in the Star Wars prequels was copied straight from what everyone agrees is the worst with Independence Day (minus the alien mothership running Windows NT 3.51 or whatever)
 
I didn't know of that Chromebook, well there's a $200 Chromebook (with a better-than-Atom x86 CPU), and that latest one is competition for the macintosh pro book, with the high dpi.

Too expensive but you can install BSD or Gentoo or Slackware or something and load it up with vi sessions, terminals, ssh, IRC, text mode mail clients and compiler output on a tiled window manager no one is able to use except you. These UI being made of raw text, they scale with the resolution! It's multimedia as well, with ncurses music players and command line mplayer to watch video.
 
I didn't know of that Chromebook, well there's a $200 Chromebook (with a better-than-Atom x86 CPU), and that latest one is competition for the macintosh pro book, with the high dpi.
Yeah, it's brand-new. It's got a 12.8" 2560x1700 touch screen, a 32-64GB SSD, 5 hours (claimed) battery life, a 1.8GHz Core i5, 4GB of RAM, a small, thin form factor and weighs 3.35lbs. Also comes with 1TB of cloud storage on Google Drive for 3 years (currently 1TB is $50/mo, making that an $1800 value....if you're into cloud storage).

A news report:
http://www.mercurynews.com/business...ebook-pixel-touchscreen-laptop-high-end-cloud

And here's the Google Play page that has the tech specs:
https://play.google.com/store/devices/details?id=chromebook_pixel_wifi

I'm rather curious to check one out sometime. My main concern is the software infrastructure, but since today pretty much the only thing I use my laptop for is connecting into my workstation to work remotely, as well as the occasional bit of web browsing, so as long as it has a good experience for doing those things, I'll be happy with it. Though it might be worthwhile to get a KVM setup to use when I'm working at home, if I ever get one.
 
Europe: Will there be a law against avidity...

Will bonus caps improve the banking industry

The Swiss have publicly voted for putting caps on bonus payments for bankers. The EU has already brought legislation on the way to do the same across the Union from 2014. But will that truly help to improve the system?
Greedy, selfish bankers- that's the image that has been engrained in the minds of many since the beginning of the financial crisis. One of the responses from students at Harvard Business School was to create the MBA Oath, which allows students and graduates to pledge to "create value responsibly and ethically." But this is probably easier said than done.
 
Back
Top