Trinity vs Ivy Bridge

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by rpg.314, Jun 29, 2011.

  1. DarthShader

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Land of Mu
  2. Alexko

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    4,541
    Likes Received:
    964
    :D

    At this point it wouldn't be surprising, but I can't see many people running DX11 games on Ivy Bridge anyway.
     
  3. Paran

    Regular Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    14

    Not me. Final driver were scheduled for January or end December.
     
  4. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,141
    Likes Received:
    4,359
    Location:
    Finland
    Yet now at CES they can't run F1 2011 in DX11, and use video of the game playing on VLC instead.
     
  5. DSC

    DSC
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    3
  6. FUDie

    Regular

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2002
    Messages:
    581
    Likes Received:
    34
  7. DSC

    DSC
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2003
    Messages:
    689
    Likes Received:
    3
  8. french toast

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Leicestershire - England
    Didnt AMD critisise Intel for using a ring bus to L3 on sandybridge, saying they wouldn't go that route for fear of 'thrashing' the cache and starving the cpu?
    I also heard ove at semi accurate that they didnt expect trinity/piledrive to have L3? i dont have an opinion my self, just thought i would throw that one into the mix....

    Saying that memory bandwidth has been a bane for all fusion processors, i actually thought the intel system was quite neat, and maybe it caught AMD by suprise, it certainly narrowed the gap to closer than it would have been.

    The dozer cores seems to be hampered by lower than intended frequency and cache latency..if they could get the process sorted, and fix those issues it would be competitive enough IMHO.
     
  9. french toast

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Leicestershire - England
    WTF? i posted that in the other ivybridge v trinity thread and it gets posted in here?:mad:
     
  10. itsmydamnation

    Veteran Regular

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,347
    Likes Received:
    469
    Location:
    Australia
  11. ToTTenTranz

    Legend Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    12,888
    Likes Received:
    7,894
    If 17W is the TDP for the whole APU, then this is really impressive, that's half the 35W TDP of the previous notebook Llano APUs.

    It would also explain why Wichita was scratched, as that power level had previously been occupied by Zacate.
    And if AMD eventually makes a low-clocked single-module Trinity going down to ~10W TDP, it could also explain why Krishna was scratched too.
     
  12. sebbbi

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes Received:
    5,296
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Looks like Z-01 replaces the whole 9W C-range (Z-01 is identical to C-50 in every way, but TDP got down from 9W to 5.9W). It's already on production (some shipping Win7 tablets are using it). And Trinity at 17W basically invalidates the whole 18W E-range. It's very interesting to see how the 17W Trinity compares to the 17W i7 3667U Ivy Bridge. 3667U CPU turbos up to 3.0 GHz, so Intel is going to keep the single thread performance crown easily, but Trinity could beat it in four thread performance, and it has likely a slightly faster GPU as well (but Ivy's new GPU isn't that bad either, so Intel is going to offer at least some competition in that area as well).
     
  13. ToTTenTranz

    Legend Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    12,888
    Likes Received:
    7,894
    Nonetheless, Intel's ULV cpus have been placed at completely different price points to what AMD has offered so far..
    I have my doubts that Trinity will compete with the i7 "U Series" Ivy Bridge at the same price.

    It'll probably be Trinity vs. i3 Ivy bridge "CULV" for best price/performance 11.6-13" subnotebooks and i7-U for premium solutions.

    That said, Trinity will probably offer substantially better graphics performance than its direct competitor, and CPU performance will be just "good enough".
     
  14. AnarchX

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,559
    Likes Received:
    34
  15. mczak

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    119
    Indeed. And Llano couldn't really achieve very impressive clocks at 35W (1.6Ghz non-turbo, 2.5Ghz Turbo), you'd think for two-module Trinity to make sense they'd need similar clocks (well if base clock is a bit lower that would be ok as long as it can turbo up in enough situations).
     
  16. Paran

    Regular Newcomer

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    251
    Likes Received:
    14
  17. hkultala

    Regular

    Joined:
    May 22, 2002
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    Herwood, Tampere, Finland
    Trinity is about 240-250mm^2 on 32nm. (Llano is 228mm^2 and trinity is slightly bigger)

    Ontario is 77 mm^2 on older, cheaper 40nm process.

    so over 3 times size difference, even bigger silicon price difference.

    So even though Trinity can get to the "power range" of Brazos, AMD can sell Brazos with much cheaper price while still getting profits from the chip.

    So Trinity cannot replace bobcat-based chips, there is lots of "low-end market" at 18W.
    What trinity can do is compete against those ULV core i3 chips.
     
  18. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,141
    Likes Received:
    4,359
    Location:
    Finland
  19. sebbbi

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes Received:
    5,296
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Of course, but in the long run Brazos seems to be fading away. There has been basically no progress in one year now (0.05 GHz overclock with E450, and another 0.05 GHz coming up later this year). Z-01 at 5.9W (1/3 of Brazos TDP) is not that far behind in performance (and is really cheap to produce), and Trinity offers much better performance at same TDP. If either the Z-01 is scaled up or Trinity is scaled down (single module version would be considerably cheaper to produce and wouldn't likely need agressive cherry picking to reach 17W), there would not be much room left for Brazos anymore. Too bad Deccan, Wichita and Krishna all got canned (28 nm would have made the E-series much more competitive in the long run).
     
  20. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,141
    Likes Received:
    4,359
    Location:
    Finland
    I haven't seen any signs of Wichita & Krisha being canned, there were a lot of false news about how they need to "redesign them for TSMC" which was obviously false, it was known like 6 months before those news that at least part of Wichita and/or Krishnas will come from TSMC.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...