"Nerve-Damage"
Regular
I'm such a sucka for Tranformers. I the movie has already got me, and I suspect this game will as well!
Did Takara even glance sideways at it? If so, I fear it may already be compromised...
I was just referring to the games, here. Some Transformer games, you see, were good. Others...? Not so good.Takara actually does half the work on most TF series'. Hasbro typically sends them the concept drawings, and Takara does the actual engineering. The Classics series is probably the high point of this. AFAIK, however, Takara has not touched the stuff related to the new movie aside from making a few japanese only toys and releasing the movie toys over there.
But they literally fucked up the cool designsBig Robots Fighting + Lots of Explosions + Michael Bay & Steven Spielberg == Recipe for Potential Goodness.
But, all of the above, PLUS Peter Cullen the original voice of Optimus Prime saying "Roll Out!" plus the original transformers sound effects when the autobots transform?!? Recipe for AWESOMENESS.
Plot is irrelevent. Acting is irrevelent.
It's all about bots and explosions.
This is a reenactment of my childhood dreams by Bay and Spielberg. :
)
Megatron?
Wouldn't it just be awesome if Megatron transformed into a giant pistol with a scope and then fell on the ground ? The US forces could claim victory.
I agree though, the designs make me shudder. They're just ugly looking things, like taking the skin off of a human and seeing all the veins, arteries, muscles, joints...
I don't think think the old designs would work well on the big screen as live action, they're way to 'blocky'. I agree with Bay here. Are the G1 designs good for toys? Yes, I like the G1 toys better (especially since they were die cast). But they'd look less realistic fighting and punching on the big screen.
The new designs are too "busy" for toys, too many parts and shit, but the reality is, as a realistic robot, they look better IMHO with all those pistons, beams, and other parts.
I bet the complaints from G1 fans over the designs will subside after the movie.
(or maybe not. I also think Frank's Megatron voice would sound too jar-jar-jarring on the big screen. It's cartoonish, but Peter's Optimus voice works even in live action. )
Go look on YouTube at some old G1 clips and play the audio over the new trailer and see if you think it works. Nostalgia sometimes causes irrational desires.
I don't think think the old designs would work well on the big screen as live action, they're way to 'blocky'. I agree with Bay here. Are the G1 designs good for toys? Yes, I like the G1 toys better (especially since they were die cast). But they'd look less realistic fighting and punching on the big screen.
The new designs are too "busy" for toys, too many parts and shit, but the reality is, as a realistic robot, they look better IMHO with all those pistons, beams, and other parts.
I bet the complaints from G1 fans over the designs will subside after the movie.
(or maybe not. I also think Frank's Megatron voice would sound too jar-jar-jarring on the big screen. It's cartoonish, but Peter's Optimus voice works even in live action. )
Go look on YouTube at some old G1 clips and play the audio over the new trailer and see if you think it works. Nostalgia sometimes causes irrational desires.
You are describing these models just as they were in the cartoon series which is not what I was expecting to see anyways in the movie.Now try your though experiment with G1 Bumblebee, Ratchet, or Ironhide. Comeon, big round clonking parts of the VW hood for feet? Or Rachet and Ironhide having big blocky front section of vehicle + bumper for "chest"?
Optimus worked as a G1 model because of his flat body semi front becoming his chest and the back part of the semi becoming his legs and feet. The rest of the G1 designs would look very very silly on the big screen.
The 'ultra real' Bayformers are about the closest youd get to what a real working xformer would look like, and that's no mistake, because ILM designed a computer program to calculate the designs and transformation sequences starting with CAD designs of the cars themselves (courtesy of GM)
Would you want a 30ft megatron to become a P38 pistol? Or a 30 ft soundwave to transform down to a boombox (also, a silly anachronism) Today's audiences, especially as adults, would be a little more sophisticated.