Yeah it's always nice to make dev's life easier so that we can get quality games faster. I'm pretty sure both have plenty of headroom left with better optimization and drivers etc.
Tomb Raider
- Thread starter Laa-Yosh
- Start date
specwarGP2
Regular
Maybe it's just me, but Far Cry 3 doesnt feel as smooth as Tomb Raider (both vsync locked to 60fps)
Hmm, all my games feel similar smoothness at 60fps. I finished Tomb Raider some time ago but just finished Far Cry 3 last night and finished Bioshock Infinite the night before. All of those games seemed to have the same feel and smoothness at 60fps, can't say I noticed any difference. I only play with 360 gamepad (never use mouse + keyboard) so maybe that's whats accounting for them not feeling the same to you?
What other features? Moving tree's is the only noticeable thing.
I'm happy keeping tessellation, POM, higher SSAO, higher FXAA quality, higher texture detail over some wavy tree's and skin you can't see 100% of the time...
RenegadeRocks
Legend
Double post.
RenegadeRocks
Legend
I am sorry I am not following this conversation, but why are you worrying about this console version so much? I mean, u already have an IQ un-achievable on the consoles
! No DE can match the smoothness of ur image or the great AO in ur shots. Be happy , man ! BTW, Gamersyde has screens, some look average and last gen, some look better. PS4 version here:
I think this image defines the game: Crumbling platforms/ground everywhere:
and good to read that PS4 version is above 50fps most of the time. I will get to it one day.
I see no POM here on the ground:
who was in charge of these horrible horrible subtitles?
apparently, THe Witcher 3 trailers also seem to lack POM, or I couldn't see it. THeir surfaces also seem very flat.
Other features including denser foliage, more moving grass, better lighting especially for fire, more particles and possible upgrades for NPCs. But I find it hilarious that you can't notice all these yet you can spot a slightly rounder shoulder and "very arguable" higher res textures during gameplay.
I understand if you prefer specific type of features in PC version but why not also give credit to where it's due for DE?
The PC version could have had all those, i think that is the issue really.
From what i saw in the PC version it looks very very PC, clean, technically perfect The things they added to the Console editions seems to be all that adds to the atmosphere of a game like this. And it's a good trade off, focus on what we can achieve and add real value to the game instead of hunting the last bit of texture res, polygon count etc that wont be noticed by anyone except the tech warriors and beyond3d members
The DF PC vs Console should be interesting, a game that is more beautiful vs a technical superior counterpart.
D
Deleted member 86764
Guest
PC on Ultra + FXAA
PS4
I know which one looks better to my eyes.... And it's not the bottom one either..
The DE version looks a lot better. Lara's skin is looking a lot more realistic. Her skin in the PC version looks matt, almost like she's been in a morgue for a few days.
D
Deleted member 86764
Guest
Wow, she looks incredible. Much prettier in the DE version too.
DavidGraham
Veteran
Why does the game lack Tessellation ? I thought consoles can handle that!
I am also disappointed that dynamic shadowing didn't have the chance to return in full force in the DE. the only bit of the game where dynamic shadows is enabled is the road to climb the mountain. Lara's torch cast the correct shadows on the objects around it. that was in the PC version. from the footage I saw the DE version still lacks these shadows.
I am also disappointed that dynamic shadowing didn't have the chance to return in full force in the DE. the only bit of the game where dynamic shadows is enabled is the road to climb the mountain. Lara's torch cast the correct shadows on the objects around it. that was in the PC version. from the footage I saw the DE version still lacks these shadows.
Looks great but also looks like a cut scene model. The cutscene models where more detailed in the original if I recall correctly so may not be a fair comparison. I'm in work atm plus it's difficult to access the cutscenes ad-hoc after you've fnished the story so It's tough for me to try and post an equivilent shot right now.
Possibly down to a difference in motion blur implementation or just the sheer amount of details panning across the screen when you move.
Obviously a locked 60fps is still delivering each frame to your screen in exactly the same way in each game.
This Xbone screen from Gamersyde looks really blurry
http://abload.de/img/tr8tsew.gif
Very blurry implementation of FXAA, different recording hardware, different image compression or upscaled game?
Also, UFG removed DOF from Xbone version
http://i.imgur.com/ddAX4oM.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AFD09ly.jpg ModNote: NSFE ಠ_ಠ
http://abload.de/img/tr8tsew.gif
Very blurry implementation of FXAA, different recording hardware, different image compression or upscaled game?
Also, UFG removed DOF from Xbone version
http://i.imgur.com/ddAX4oM.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AFD09ly.jpg ModNote: NSFE ಠ_ಠ
RenegadeRocks
Legend
Both versions were ported by different devs, so could be different implementations/optimisations/cutbacks.
I am happy I got a ps4 this gen. I was ready for a change after ps2 and 3 before MS announced its watercooler and killed all my interest.
I am happy I got a ps4 this gen. I was ready for a change after ps2 and 3 before MS announced its watercooler and killed all my interest.
I caved in pre ordered the PS4 version even though I didn't really like the game all that much as a TR and Lara Croft fan.
Similar threads
