That's literally what "poaching" means.
Is that what "poached eggs" means too?
That's literally what "poaching" means.
These really should be outlawed. A person should always be able to ply their trade and make a living for themselves. If you don't work for someone anymore, they should have no input on what you are able to say or do.
If someone is to be barred from working for a competitor then the former employer should be legally required to pay them full salary and benefits for the duration.
They are deemed dubious and have been challenged in the past so only certain companies put such stringent "laws" into their contract as it can be liable to lawsuits; context being tech companies generally and not working on government/defense related type projects.These really should be outlawed. A person should always be able to ply their trade and make a living for themselves. If you don't work for someone anymore, they should have no input on what you are able to say or do.
If someone is to be barred from working for a competitor then the former employer should be legally required to pay them full salary and benefits for the duration.
...Not really a topic for this thread tho, I know.
Yeah, but some people enjoy working, they shouldn't be forcibly denied the chance to pursue their dreams. Also, going on involuntary (or otherwise, as in your case) vacation could conceivably mean your knowledge and skills become rusty and somewhat outdated, lowering your value on the job market. (Don't get me started on treating human beings as merchandise... )I wasn't complaining, 1 year paid vacation was just perfect.
Generally these non-compete clauses also come with salary payments by the original company. I know my non-compete clause was for 1 year and was accompanied by 1 year of salary too. I wasn't complaining, 1 year paid vacation was just perfect. Better yet, I returned as a consultant for the original company during the last 4 months of that, and was essentially getting paid 3x my original salary during that time.
Why wouldn't it be legal to have staff move around? AMD transferred a whole high-speed interface team to Synopsys a while back.I'm really wondering if there was some kind of a backroom/wink-and-a-nod type agreement between AMD and Intel about allowing Raja to go to Intel as part of the chip deal. I'm not sure if that's legal or not, but it sure seems convenient as hell timing.
Or focusing on the software side.
In this position, Koduri will expand Intel’s leading position in integrated graphics for the PC market with high-end discrete graphics solutions for a broad range of computing segments.
Okay, what the fuck.Raja hired by Intel.
Intel to make high-end discrete GPUs.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1201...ete-gpus-hires-raja-koduri-as-chief-architect
https://newsroom.intel.com/news-releases/raja-koduri-joins-intel/
What a rollercoaster.