RussSchultz said:
Ditto. I've never even suggested it to any of the *numerous* <g> women I've been with.
Tenn. county wants to ban gays
- Thread starter John Reynolds
- Start date
Ditto. I've never even suggested it to any of the *numerous* <g> women I've been with.
I think you have posts confused. I picked a definition of democracy that was clearly stated in my post, and then you attacked it.sytaylor said:
thats ok, no need to apologize. Anyone could have made such a mistake.
later,
epic
but it seems to me that if you live in a democracy
See that completley flies in the face of every properly implimented democracy on the planet.. name one of the G7 that allows that? Oh wait there isn't one. So you picked a narrow aspect of democracy to suggest magority rule is a reason for acting stupid? and IM the one that should appologise? Reality check required methinks...
Arent we getting a bit hot under the collar?sytaylor said:
no need to name call, unless thats how you argue back. Anyways, majority rule is a central part of democracy. I dont know how you get one with out the other. BTW the types of govermnent the G7 have are:
japan: constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary government
germany:federal republic
france:republic
italy:republic
canada:confederation with parliamentary democracy
UK:constitutional monarchy
USA:Constitution-based federal republic
source: cia.gov
later,
epic
Far from being hot under the collar i'm still trying to understand why you were at least suggesting that majority rule would be better than the democracy we have today. Whatever technical term you put on it, representative democracies are not as narrow and majority rule as you suggest. In going lengthwise to proove that democracy isnt majority rule, although it is in definition (well at least by your definition) what have you achieved? A democratic society is not majority rule. That *SHOULD* stop stupid laws
Furthermore I never called anyone stupid, nor attacked anyone personally. I simply suggested you should take a reality check, a point I would re-itterate on the basis of said accusation.
Furthermore I never called anyone stupid, nor attacked anyone personally. I simply suggested you should take a reality check, a point I would re-itterate on the basis of said accusation.
To each, his own.
For me, the ass is for shitting.
For me, the ass is for shitting.
Natoma said:John Reynolds said:
To hear you two talk, you'd think those that engage in anal sex (gay and straight) were all scatting.
To think some people have never heard of a douche.
NATOMA!!!!!!!!!!
:?Natoma said:Oops, did I say too much?
Well personally i don't care, i'm just saying... Anyway i've been wondering for a long time what is it with the obvious interest on this board in what we do... Go figure...
Christ, can't I even have an opinion that differs from yours on anal sex?Natoma said:I guess I can see that. For the longest time I thought mouths were only for eating and drinking. Little did I know.
* Natoma pokes Russ
Or must we all accept it as good, clean, and natural?
Natoma said:bi curious?
OMFG, you two have penetrated the carefully crafted facade I've maintained for years!!!
Note to self: Don't read the B3D General Discussions forum in between setting up workstations at school.
HAHAHA This thread finally got interesting!!!
Natoma said:mmmmmm penetrate.......
You don't think that word choice was an accident do you?
John Reynolds said:Natoma said:mmmmmm penetrate.......
You don't think that word choice was an accident do you?
Mmmmmmm non-accidental penetration.... The signs are there, Natoma...
(What's with the site? took me like 30 seconds to load each page...)