SSR is used far more extensively in Detroit, the Bokeh quality is also beyond anything I've seen to date and used far more than BF2. I thought the snow scene looked incredible too. But aside from the small nitpicks here, the bulk of the game's rendering feature and asset quality is easily far above the likes of BF.
What tessellation underwater? Are you talking about the tessellation ocean line being visible in wireframe mode?
You have that backwards, an engine has to be more robust to support unpredictable gameplay scenarios than one that simply supports scripted events.
There seems to be a distinct lack of black people in Detroit which is strange considering it's over 80% African American.
).Why are you switching from U4 to GTA5? As you yourself pointed out, GTA5 is simulation based while U4 is mostly scripted events.
Is this a joke ? No NPCs, no dialogues, no AI, no story. I mean there's just nothing in this game outside of random maps where the players can play. There are far more possible interactions in basically any classic game compared to any multiplayer only game.
Also, about the physics :
Uncharted 4 probably has the most advanced physics of any current gen game.
Can you show me comparable gifs with Battlefront ? :
Honestly, it's getting ridiculous...
A map that isn't static to me is something like that :
And please, explain to me why games like Forza Horizon 3, Origins, Gears of War 4 always fail to run at 60fps on X while they only had to reduce the resolution in Fornite to hit 60fps ?
Edit : i found a link that basically says the same thing than me (in a much better english
https://iq.intel.co.uk/open-world-games-break-pc/ : "While a GPU renders what you see onscreen, the CPU orchestrates it, taking care of crucial behind-the-scenes computations like game logic and AI. While a first person shooter like Star Wars: Battlefront might astonish with its high-resolution visuals, underneath the Frostbite engine’s photogrammetric textures and volumetric lighting, the game mechanics are fairly simple. Only the multiplayer aspect puts a strain on the CPU.
Conversely, a simulation or open world game needs to perform a never-ending stream of calculations below the surface. In GTA V, for example, the vibrant city of Los Santos wouldn’t feel alive without people wandering its streets, cars driving on its roads or aircraft zooming across its sky. But this means thousands of objects to track, interactions to calculate and consequences to process."
The chase scene is 99% scripted, unscripted gameplay is far more complex. U4 is vastly different from GTAV. To use them interchangeably just because both run at 30fps is just silly.Because i was comparing 30fps games to 60fps games. It doesn't matter and it doesn't change anything to my point.
Which game is more difficult to run at 60fps : Battlefront or Uncharted 4 ?
60fps games tend to be more basic. This is the very reason why they can run at a higher framerate. But this point is even more exarcerbated in multiplayer only games where there's basically no game mechanic. There's basically nothing oustide of random maps. How can you compare that to classic games with an actual story ?
The chase scene in Uncharted 4 is far more complex than anything you can find in Battlefront.
In this pic only you have more assets variety than in the whole map of Endor... please, compare what's comparable... Jupiter was implying that the game doesn't run at 60fps due to a lack of optimization which is obviously false.
Even the X systematically fails to double the framerate of XB1 games. There's a reason for that... QB is a small linear game, yet there's no 60fps mode on X. Even a game like that is far more complex than Battlefront.
You have to consider the whole package. I mean it's the basic logic for any any reasonable comparison. Just because a game runs at 60fps doesn't make it automatically more impressive. Same thing for an open world.
