Its correct in the fact a consoled version was re released on p.c
but i dont agree with the review of the game, does it have it''s faults, hell yes but it's not worst game evar territory
there are some enjoyment to be had and in fairness some frustration but it's 19p for gods sake
ps: my post in the "what are you playing now" thread from 2014 (and having spent more time thinking about it there certainly is the argument that I'm looking at it with rose tinted glasses, but again I did enjoy some of it and it's 19p)
In 2002 the Gaming Gods tasked me with an epic 12 year quest
to beat Iron Storm.
"Set in an alternate history in which World War 1 never ended, the game takes place in 1964, the 50th year of the war, and focuses on an Allied soldier's mission to stop the Russo-Mongolian Empire from developing nuclear weapons and his later efforts to end the war."
Among my many trials were such hideous opponents as vague objectives, game breaking bugs, cheap gameplay mechanics like invincible enemies who are unkillable for plot reasons they are supposed to perform an action then leave the area but because of the bugs they cant do things like operate the doors to leave and so you die until you get a reload that doesnt have the bug, enemies who can take several clips to die but can one shot insta kill you. convoluted levels that have to be performed in a very specific non obvious way that you would never figure out if it wasnt for a walk through on youtube.
My mission was to track down and kill an evil scientist who was developing nuclear weapons and after 12 years and many attempts I finally reach his extremely heavily guarded base, there I battle trough hoards of enemies, until i am close to his inner sanctum. Cue a cutscene were someone else kills him and then I board a helicopter and go home.