Technically yes.
Is SPECint enough?
Screenshots?
Technically yes.
Is SPECint enough?
That’s fairly insufficient. But sure, post those benchmarks with all the relevant info (clocks, memory, thermals and so on).Technically yes.
Is SPECint enough?
Maybe.Screenshots?
Idk chief a lot of procurements rely on SPEC scores so it probably is.That’s fairly insufficient.
Maybe.
Can I DM you?
Yay.Absolutely
Fuck no I'll get my head sliced off by like three different people.Can I re-post them?
Yay.
Fuck no I'll get my head sliced off by like three different people.
It is and will be marketed as such lul.Zen3 with either high end rdna2 or ampere gpu seems like a perfect next gen dream machine.
Ah, oke.I'll wait for the benchmarks then. Thanks.
Seems kinda low against RKL tbh. But we'll see, right?Just expect some very nice (think high teens at least) ST gains.
RKL frankencore is nowhere near Zen3 unfortunately.Seems kinda low against RKL tbh
Yeah.But we'll see, right?
Idk chief a lot of procurements rely on SPEC scores so it probably is.
PS5 and XBSX should be both near RTX 2080 Super land
Thanks to PS5 specs, all points to rdna 2 could carry some impressive clocks
You really think RTX 3070 will double 2070S? PS5 closer to 2070S and XBSX closer to 2080S ok...so PS5 close to navi 10, will see. Anyway, 2080 Ti is 16TFlop at real gaming clocks of 1830Mhz, 5700XT is 9.5TFlop at real gaming clocks of around 1890Mhz, while performance difference is currently 43% 1440p and 50% 2160p, so its clear navis TFlops are more performant than Turings in gaming real world (RT off), let alone Amperes which seems like 2/3rd Turings in gaming performance wise.PS5 probably around 2070/2070s. Theoretically a 3070 is double the performannce.
Yes a narrow 36cu part. A 80CU variant wont be screaming along at 2.3ghz range of speeds.
You really think RTX 3070 will double 2070S? PS5 closer to 2070S and XBSX closer to 2080S ok...so PS5 close to navi 10, will see. Anyway, 2080 Ti is 16TFlop at real gaming clocks of 1830Mhz, 5700XT is 9.5TFlop at real gaming clocks of around 1890Mhz, while performance difference is currently 43% 1440p and 50% 2160p, so its clear navis TFlops are more performant than Turings in gaming real world (RT off), let alone Amperes which seems like 2/3rd Turings in gaming performance wise.
3080 is genuinely an >okay product if you don't mind housefires.So far all estimations of 30x0 are based on nVidias own numbers, and Digital Foundry who were only allowed to use a few titles specifically selected by nVidia (gee, wonder why?).
nVidia knows that lacking better information, tech sites and forum warriors will run with what crumbs of information they have, but it really doesn’t make sense to get Very Invested in how these upcoming cards will perform relative to each other since we don’t have good performance data for any of them.
Bro Milan and Rome platforms are one and the same.Without system configuration information
Yeah, one has to cope with cache and mem actively being loaded to death while the other is not.Furthermore, Milan and Rocket Lake are targeting very different markets
3080 is genuinely an >okay product if you don't mind housefires.