*spawn Twice as fast / twice faster

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by fehu, Aug 31, 2009.

  1. gl33k

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    1
    this debate is absolutly fraking hilarious ! economist attempt to know if they should buy title or something ??? :lol:
     
  2. paawl

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sorry to all the posters who think otherwise, but common usage in American English (and all British English I've ever seen, but I won't speak for my colleagues across the pond) scientific and engineering publications is:

    x times faster == x times as fast
    100*x percent faster == (x+1) times faster == (x+1) times as fast

    x times faster != (x+1) times as fast

    I challenge anyone to find more than a handful of contrary examples by a native English speaker in a peer-reviewed publication; alternatively, you may supply a definitive reference (eg, IEEE style guidelines) that claims the contrary.

    "Math and logic" have nothing to do with it--it's English. :)
     
  3. Colourless

    Colourless Monochrome wench
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    1,274
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    Somewhere in outback South Australia
    10% faster = 1 + 10%
    10% as fast as = 1 * 10% = really f'ing slow
     
  4. almighty

    Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    5
    Why is everyone making this complicated?

    If a 4870 is '1'

    And a 4870x2 is '2'

    Then a 5870 is '1.6'
     
  5. zed

    zed
    Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,415
    Likes Received:
    2,139
    FWIW
    times is another word for multiple i.e. * == times
     
  6. Arwin

    Arwin Now Officially a Top 10 Poster
    Moderator Legend

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    18,762
    Likes Received:
    2,639
    Location:
    Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Guys, you wouldn't believe it, but most linguists have fully taken the empirical approach. They no longer write prescriptive grammar, but descriptive grammar. Whatever use is common enough, will become canon. That's why a lot of these kinds of debates can these days be solved by Google - do a search, and whichever way of using things comes up more wins.

    In this case though, what's even more interesting is that every ffing hit returned gives you the same discussion as this thread is currently having. :D

    And of course in the context of GPU evolution, 60% is already quite a lot, and probably best case scenario I'll wager?
     
  7. paawl

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    To support Awrin's point, see:

    http://www.themathpage.com/arith/ratio-and-proportion_1.htm#more

    This quote is particularly enlightening.

     
  8. zed

    zed
    Legend

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,415
    Likes Received:
    2,139
    Just to clarify so ppl do start answering 110km/hr is 0.1 times faster than 100km/hr in their tests only to get a big red cross through the answer

    I believe part of the problem arises due to some ppl here not being native english speakers.

    Take the sentence
    'Give Harry 150% of the pie'
    Nothing wrong with it gramatically but its illogical as in nonsense.

    the same as saying

    a half times faster
    0.75 times faster or even
    one times faster

    even saying them a native speaker can tell they feel wrong, due to the first part contradicting the word faster.
    What you should say is prolly
    50% faster
    1.75 times faster
    twice as fast
     
  9. Kaotik

    Kaotik Drunk Member
    Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    4,465
    Location:
    Finland
    The 1.75 times faster doens't fit there, the other 2 work fine, but the middle should be 75% faster
     
  10. paawl

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2007
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    In common English, "75% faster" and "1.75 times faster" mean the same thing. Did you read the quote from Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage that I provided above?

    If you want even more evidence, citing both Webster and Oxford, see the following nice writeup in the Boston Globe:

    http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/10/21/do_the_math/

    The evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idiomatic usage. The only surprise to me is how old these idioms are (more than 200 years old!).
     
  11. Chris123234

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Regardless of how ignorant people commonly misuse phrases (Or how lazy dictionaries want to be), the English structure supersedes idiocy, AFAIC.

    Two times (Twice) as fast =/= Two times faster.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...