SGI "ain't going down like that": set to exit bankruptcy protection
- Thread starter Farid
- Start date
Geez, change the name already. It's embarrassing that they are going to brand around "SGI" because the actual name is so ill-suited to what they are today and where they want to go as a company. What branding advantage do they get by holding on to the name at this point?
I find it a bit bizarre that they've chosen to base their new range of x86 boxes on Xeon rather than Opteron. There are so many parallels between the architecture of an Opteron MP system and the large NUMA systems that have kept them alive over the years its not funny. Xeon? Hmmm. Torrenza <-> Project Ultraviolet.
Maybe Intel had a hand in this. They've certainly kept SGI afloat over the past few years with their very generous (>100%) discounts on Itanium 2s. Perhaps they're wanting pay-back.
If they want to do clusters they're going to have to prove they got some worthwhile value-add too. Cluster management software? Dunno, do they have that? If they don't have it in-house they're going to have to partner with someone who does (even Sun, for example, don't try to pretend that they "do clusters" themselves).
My experience of SGI tech support has been truly excellent, far superior to a certain other three-letter company. I dare say they have a lot of happy customers. Maybe they're hoping to live off that.
Maybe Intel had a hand in this. They've certainly kept SGI afloat over the past few years with their very generous (>100%) discounts on Itanium 2s. Perhaps they're wanting pay-back.
If they want to do clusters they're going to have to prove they got some worthwhile value-add too. Cluster management software? Dunno, do they have that? If they don't have it in-house they're going to have to partner with someone who does (even Sun, for example, don't try to pretend that they "do clusters" themselves).
My experience of SGI tech support has been truly excellent, far superior to a certain other three-letter company. I dare say they have a lot of happy customers. Maybe they're hoping to live off that.
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreed. When I used to go to trade shows in the late 80s, it was always the SGI boxes that were drawing attention with the real-time 3D.
I'm also sorry to say we recently got rid of the indigo that was in our office
I'm also sorry to say we recently got rid of the indigo that was in our office
you had an indigo there lying ready for the grabbing and you did nothing?
bad Simon, bad!..or didn't you, actually? ; )
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry, I believe it's gone to silicon heaven.you had an indigo there laying ready for the grabbing and you did nothing?
Last edited by a moderator:
SGI built some truly beautiful and inspiring systems during its time, the O2 and Octane boxes were fantastic to look at, and even some of the the fridge-sized Onyxes were nothing short of awesome.
Too bad they let the market run away from them, but that is often the case with very specialized companies... Like in nature, they have problems competing when conditions change dramatically.
They might be out of chapter 11, but I expect them to be back in that same position again before long.
Too bad they let the market run away from them, but that is often the case with very specialized companies... Like in nature, they have problems competing when conditions change dramatically.
They might be out of chapter 11, but I expect them to be back in that same position again before long.
Megadrive1988
Veteran
we've all heard of various companies that were formed by groups of engineers breaking away from SGI
(i.e. 3Dfx, ArtX) and groups of talented engineers leaving SGI for consumer oriented companies
(the InfiniteReality team left SGI for Nvidia and designed the NV10~GeForce256 GPU). as well as many other smaller defections from SGI to other startups or other established 3D graphics companies.
but I read something recently that surprised me, although I'm not sure it's true... that SGI was actually a startup itself in the early 80s, from people or a team of people leaving Evans & Sutherland, one of the original creators of 3D graphics (if not THE creator of 3D graphics). is that true ?
during the early to mid 1990s, SGI was on top of the world in terms of realtime and offline rendered graphics. the fridge-sized Onyx2's with RealityEngine graphics were a sight to behold.
(i.e. 3Dfx, ArtX) and groups of talented engineers leaving SGI for consumer oriented companies
(the InfiniteReality team left SGI for Nvidia and designed the NV10~GeForce256 GPU). as well as many other smaller defections from SGI to other startups or other established 3D graphics companies.
but I read something recently that surprised me, although I'm not sure it's true... that SGI was actually a startup itself in the early 80s, from people or a team of people leaving Evans & Sutherland, one of the original creators of 3D graphics (if not THE creator of 3D graphics). is that true ?
during the early to mid 1990s, SGI was on top of the world in terms of realtime and offline rendered graphics. the fridge-sized Onyx2's with RealityEngine graphics were a sight to behold.
Last edited by a moderator:
i, too, seem to remember something along this line. can't find any links right now to back this up, though.
SGI becoming an IP company?
One way forward for them, I suppose:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/24/sgi_ati_lawsuit/
One way forward for them, I suppose:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/24/sgi_ati_lawsuit/
Glad to hear they worked their way out of the 11, that ain't an easy thing to do.
I wonder how many of their staff they've lost during chapter 11. I know a few in their better guys in the HPC and technical area left a few months ago (voluntarily as far as I know). If goodly chunk of their talent has read the writing on the walls and jumped ship they could be in trouble.