Meaning Samsung made a dev/demo tablet with itMeaning it still exists but will go for tablets only or what? <- confused as hell....
Meaning Samsung made a dev/demo tablet with itMeaning it still exists but will go for tablets only or what? <- confused as hell....
Meaning Samsung made a dev/demo tablet with it![]()
I caught that too, it should be 72 Gflops right?
I think it's fair to say that it's 72 GFLOPs for T604 at 533 MHz, peak. Not that there are FLOPs from SFU units in their pipe, but any SFU FLOPs should be 'valid' if you can trivially retire instructions from the units in general shading.
I think it's fair to say that NV technical marketing is struggling to get the finer details of the competition right at this point![]()
I think it's fair to say that NV technical marketing is struggling to get the finer details of the competition right at this point![]()
Meaning it still exists but will go for tablets only or what? <- confused as hell....
Someone must have forgotten to give this man the memo that Octa is not coming to smartphones
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-rz8aPVxv24
There is some hope left
He's also stating the 70% power advantage over the 4412, while at CES the slides were clearly stating that that 70% decrease was relative to the 4210. He's exactly what his title says he is, director of marketing and nothing else.Someone must have forgotten to give this man the memo that Octa is not coming to smartphones
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-rz8aPVxv24
There is some hope left
These AnTuTu results seem too low, or the chip is not running at the claimed 1.8GHz.
These AnTuTu results seem too low, or the chip is not running at the claimed 1.8GHz.
They barely make for such a difference, I tested this myself. At least on the kernel side they are insignificant. The Android libraries might be something else.The standard Android kernel lacks a lot of the latest Linaro CPU optimizations. I wouldn't really doubt those T4 CPU scores.