Why would I exclude Apple? From what I can tell Swift is a custom core based on ARM instruction sets.
Why would I exclude Apple? From what I can tell Swift is a custom core based on ARM instruction sets.
I only said that because Apple's Swift core isn't in any chip that's a direct competitor to Samsung's Exynos chips. Not unless Apple starts licensing or selling it's own chips to other manufacturers. It is true that it's indirect competition of course.
thats all about to change
, submitted me latest game (should be in appstore in a week or so)http://www.zedzeek.com/rollybolly/ Sure u could do the same basic thing in 2d, but it detracts from the immersion a bit.
though youre right about touchscreens not being suited to most game (rollybolly being an exception, in fact tilting the screen works better than a keypad,stick could)
latest ios game btw, same issue how to control the ship? player tilts the screen (u can also drag your finger across the screen, but thats not as good)
but both are no way as good as proper input
here Ive got the camera on ~30degree tilt so you can see whats coming up more, to do this in 2d is practically impossible. So the extra 3d power for phones can be put to practical use
french toast
Veteran
Hey, been a while er right, dissapointed with the recent revelations about 544 mp3 to be honest....I know its very powerfull for a phone and we are all spoiled these days, but was really hoping for some more midgard uarch...I can only hope that the sgx licence is for he exynos 5 quad already mentioned and likely used for windows rt...
er right, dissapointed with the recent revelations about 544 mp3 to be honest....I know its very powerfull for a phone and we are all spoiled these days, but was really hoping for some more midgard uarch...I can only hope that the sgx licence is for he exynos 5 quad already mentioned and likely used for windows rt...Can be easily faked but leak of SGS4 in Antutu
http://rbmen.blogspot.jp/2013/01/galaxy-s-ivsamsung-gt-i950018ghz.html
http://rbmen.blogspot.jp/2013/01/galaxy-s-ivsamsung-gt-i950018ghz.html
Nebuchadnezzar
Legend
It's a build.prop device spoof, fake. The 9500 model was also already used last year for their prototype Tizen phone. Funny enough, it's probably a Note 2 overclocked using my kernel.
Yeah the scores made me think it was fake. But i had also read they wont use 9400 because the number 4 is supposedly bad luck in Korea.
CrayonHiphop
Newcomer
What's the difference between 543 and 544 ?
questionable source but rumors are always interesting
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...let-at-mwc-2013-quad-core2c-gpgpu-inside.aspx
Sammobile also claims Samsung has a new high end tablet in the pipeline with model number GT-P8200
Nexus 10 had model number GT-P8110
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...let-at-mwc-2013-quad-core2c-gpgpu-inside.aspx
Sammobile also claims Samsung has a new high end tablet in the pipeline with model number GT-P8200
Nexus 10 had model number GT-P8110
If it should contain a T678 it will have 8 clusters and not any random number between 1 and 8 as BSN implies. The funny thing would be that ARM itself has the 678 listed for 2014 on its own website's roadmap while the 604 is to be followed by the 624: http://www.arm.com/images/graphics-and-GPU-Compute-roadmap.jpg
Where does the T628 fit in though? It can be scaled to 8 cores wich according to ARM would be 2X T624 in graphics and compute
Since T678 is 2014 according to the roadmap, i would assume T628 was created to fill in the vacuum left in 2013 performance wise
Good question; I don't even know what the difference between 628 and 678 actually is as ARM shows in its pics the same 8 clusters for both.
From ARM's homesite for the T628:
For T678:
Whereby the 658 is no longer listed on their site. Call me confused.
french toast
Veteran
Guys what about power consumption of that new midguard uarch...anandtech article didnt put the t604 in a good light...not awefull..but not as good as sgx 5 series...
How can one conclude anything from that horrible GPU test? Without knowing specifics like frames or resolution or even what game etc its nothing but an advertisement for Intel
If you compared a HD4000 vs GTX 670 at HD resolution for the former and full HD or more for the latter and ignored frames and any other specifics, just looked at maximum/minimum mW then HD 4000 would look like a real winner right?
french toast
Veteran
Well as it comes from a nexus device yea you may have a point...but this samsung sgx licence is still to show up...maybe its windows 8 drivers...or maybe its t604 power consumption. ..just speculating here..
french toast
Veteran
An interesting demonstration of how LITTLE big works with simple tasks in the context of power saving.
Note I dont think the above demo used a gpu for page rendering...would think that also would increase efficiency and power consumption?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-pr...big-little-arm-architecture-of-exynos-5-octa/
Note I dont think the above demo used a gpu for page rendering...would think that also would increase efficiency and power consumption?
http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-pr...big-little-arm-architecture-of-exynos-5-octa/
D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
It's clearly mentioned in the beginning that the prototype SoC has no GPU acceleration whatsoever.
That sample had 5*Cortex A7 plus 2*Cortex A15. I didn't know they could match an odd number of Cortex A7 to an even number of Cortex A15 in big.LITTLE. The thing is a lot more flexible than I thought.
Similar threads
- Deleted member 13524
- Mobile Devices and SoCs