Revolution = "paradigm shift"

[hovz]

simpliying the hell out of it and make it incredibly easy doesnt equate to balancing it.

 

[Fodder]

The point is that saying people are morons because they think a game is better, without any valid points, is childish.

Just like to point out here that I didn't.

How about Nintendo package all their classics in within the new franchises?

The new StarFox (which is incidentally one of my most-wanted for 2005) looks to do something a little like this.

 

[Acert93]

The point is that saying people are morons because they think a game is better, without any valid points, is childish.

Just like to point out here that I didn't.

Roger Most of us are just talking and sharing different perspectives on games we enjoy and what we like and why certain aspects are good or not so good. Getting feedback from others, and considering it, is useful. It can be quite easy to get locked in and miss the entire forest for a single tree. It is also important to remember that our own experience may be different than others, therefor assuming everyone will have the same tastes, interests, expectations, etc... is getting ahead of ourselves. You are not doing that Actually, these have been some of the more civilized console discussions I have seen

 

[Blade]

My brief take on MKD vs MK64..

Own(ed) both, love both, each one has its pros and cons.

MK64: Better track design, more difficulty, better music, overall better battle mode.

MKD: Better graphics, better power-slide (easier but more useable) .. better weapons, 2-man carts, online play via WP.

I didn't mention things like the weapon idiosyncrasies in each game, because frankly they worked in either game but were added/removed for balance. I love the 3-shell shield and the ability to hold items out in MK64, but it would have been too much in DD.

 

[hovz]

Edited by moderator:


hovz, it's time for you to leave. Enough of your trolling.