"This problem cannot be dealt with just by Sony" was what was just said by (I believe) their CIO. That certainly sounds like Sony putting their head in the sand, especially if the initial exploit was due to an out of date Apache install. Law Enforcement is for punitive, post-investigative purposes but has zero to do with prevention and best practices. I am not getting "we screwed up, we are going to right the ship" out of this at all, I am instead getting "Anonymous is so mean. Look, a free cookie!" If anything, Sony seems to be looking at this as a marketing opportunity for Playstation+.
They also brought up Anonymous *again* to try to deflect blame despite there being no evidence whatsoever this has anything to do with them (seems more likely a generic automated script looking for vulnerable systems from what they have said so far).
Cheers
I heard that he said that Anon had attacked their services but there was no clear evidence that is was them.
PSN+ was just mentioned where Kaz made clear that they would Refund those that would like to get out of PSN+ and refund the wallet. How is this a promotion?
Besides, Anon is no one and everyone, so why shouldn´t it be someone that was a part of the original attack? You don´t know, and anon doesn´t know. It´s like seperating pepsi from coke in a bucket of cola.