Question/help -- 3d/fps logs -- your opinion -- experts?

[glawton]

which sets of data is better: (one is longer but try to do your best.
pls just tell me either #1 or #2, and yes im asking you to help me.

#1 (reminder this is NOT frapssec.txt)
----
2004-09-19 20:40:27 - hl2
72
64
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
69
68
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
66
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2004-09-19 20:41:04 - hl2
0
8
0
0
0
50
8
5
70
16
21
68
69
54
66
67
70
70
69
68
70
66
70
67
68
68
69
67
64
62
70
69
62
68
55
66
69
68
70
70
70
70
67
59
67
69
70
70
70
70
68
53
54
50
59
60
66
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
68
65
62
68
70
70
55
59
62
60
47
41
53
51
48
43
63
67
64
47
57
53
48
61
53
69
69
51
55
54
56
68
71
69
49
53
70
60
59
54
54
54
60
63
51
65
58
63
65
70
70
70
63
68
67
70
61
56
54
59
57
38
40
39
50
53
55
56
52
56
51
51
52
56
61
63
59
60
62
63
64
64
65
69
69
70
70
69
67
66
69
68
70
70
70
64
65
67
66
70
69
70
70
70
70
65
70
65
70
69
69
68
71
69
71
69
71
69
70
69
70
70
70
69
70
70
71
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
69
70
69
70
70
40
56
60
60
56
54
52
48
45
61
51
45
50
53
57
66
61
63
64
63
68
66
68
68
66
66
67
66
64
62
61
57
57
70
68
65
63
64
66
65
52
57
52
54
54
59
64
64
59
59
57
56
56
53
52
56
37
35
54
54
54
52
48
43
40
38
34
37
44
49
48
46
47
47
48
45
50
55
55
57
63
64
64
65
64
64
64
67
70
70
70
70
69
71
69
70
64
70
36
36
34
32
35
35
35
35
35
39
55
35
35
55
68
65
62
57
45
61
68
67
61
61
69
71
70
66
44
37
44
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2004-09-19 20:50:42 - hl2
69
64
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2004-09-19 20:51:19 - hl2
8
0
0
0
43
11
0
64
70
35
0
19
34
46
52
58
65
63
66
64
67
66
69
61
66
61
61
67
46
54
66
67
66
64
58
57
57
58
57
56
58
60
63
66
66
54
58
55
67
56
65
62
62
46
44
43
46
61
53
53
46
47
44
57
68
62
53
43
45
41
39
52
50
46
48
49
43
46
55
64
70
70
70
66
62
58
59
67
69
69
69
68
65
59
56
58
60
63
36
43
48
50
49
51
55
57
57
58
59
59
71
70
69
68
70
70
70
70
69
71
70
67
70
62
67
70
63
65
71
70
70
66
70
39
36
35
34
35
35
35
35
35
31
34
36
37
42
35
35
35
36
51
57
67
65
64
67
70
66
53
68
69
70
70
61
59
71
70
60
70
69
67
70
67
65
69
60
53
68
70
69
69
58
55
58
62
60
65
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

#2
------
2004-09-19 20:31:49 - hl2
61
70
70
65
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
68
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
35
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2004-09-19 20:32:45 - hl2
3
5
0
0
0
21
23
7
0
35
70
70
1
0
37
47
64
68
64
67
23
55
68
70
43
25
43
63
61
55
55
50
51
36
39
43
40
45
46
56
59
62
63
61
62
63
69
63
61
63
66
69
66
70
51
54
57
49
48
57
60
60
58
68
46
55
58
51
68
70
70
70
44
36
35
36
35
35
35
35
39
42
42
43
43
43
46
51
58
51
64
68
70
42
42
41
41
41
43
12
10
69
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0





2004-09-19 20:59:34 - hl2
70
67
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
68
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
40
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2004-09-19 21:00:22 - hl2
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
52
10
8
0
0
38
70
17
0
6
58
45
46
69
35
40
48
47
35
36
53
52
63
61
60
59
48
60
54
62
70
67
70
66
65
65
65
70
57
48
52
48
57
60
56
53
41
43
50
54
60
56
55
43
45
49
57
50
52
60
57
46
47
27
35
26
35
35
35
37
39
38
35
37
41
45
51
59
56
56
69
69
70
64
61
57
53
61
65
61
44
35
41
37
48
48
33
42
47
51
52
53
54
57
58
58
57
59
61
62
60
68
69
68
70
70
62
63
68
69
63
60
62
63
70
69
70
70
70
70
46
56
50
65
64
67
70
70
70
70
70
70
67
71
67
69
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
70
61
61
67
70
65
65
61
66
70
68
66
63
70
47
61
54
55
64
65
71
60
66
70
64
66
70
70
70
53
51
51
51
52
51
56
64
54
53
35
57
70
69
70
70
70
70
70
68
68
69
71
69
67
64
47
55
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
69
70
70
70
44
64
61
56
44
55
41
48
34
35
55
57
59
66
70
70
62
70
67
69
69
54
50
51
51
50
51
51
51
52
50
52
51
47
49
50
50
50
50
50
49
50
51
53
52
53
53
54
53
53
53
53
40
28
35
35
40
48
41
58
58
54
51
52
47
50
55
63
70
69
69
70
70
67
70
70
70
70
69
70
70
70
69
71
69
63
56
68
70
70
70
69
68
63
54
61
65
61
59
65
65
69
50
36
35
42
48
28
39
36
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0



----


these two logs are run in vice versa meaning CT first on one and T's first on other then vice versa. Which graph performs best to you!

 

[bloodbob]

*COUGH* umm you think you could ahve posted this as a link to a file or something rather then taking up 30 screen fulls just numbers????????

And are you sure this data is correct as their are a fair few lots of 0 fps??? was their actually 0 fps scored? Also why aren't their any scores over 70fps are you only trying to look at a single specfic resoultion and quality setting if not then having vsync on is probably bad.

 

[glawton]

NO ACTUAL 0'S WERE SCORED! its a mistake with fraps.


And yes i know one is quite a bit longer than the other but the averages should be similiar, i had to wait in order to switch teams.


they may look the same, but are actually VERY different hardware.

I need experts to tell me which is better!

 

[Rys]

Can't you import into a spreadsheet program and graph it yourself?

Links to text files would have been nice too 8)

Rys

 

[glawton]

Can't you import into a spreadsheet program and graph it yourself?

Links to text files would have been nice too 8)

Rys

Thats the problem, no I cant. Can you help me out?

 

[Fodder]

Copy each set of results into Excel, remove the lines containing zeros, type =avg(firstcell:lastcell) (I think? My Excel skills are rusty) into another cell, and you get the average. Alternately you can try the graph tool.

 

[Tim Murray]

DUBYA DUBYA DUBYA DOT OPEN OFFICE DOT OH AR GEE

I had some crazyass Excel stuff to handle CoD timedemo logs (since it records rendering time per frame). Worked well... at least, it seemed to work well. Was kinda crazy. You shouldn't need to average those since they're FPS values to begin with. Make a graph, that'd be simpler.