Question about revolution cooling

[randycat99]

It will fill in gaps if it needs to. That's not the same as it erasing the thermal effect of a gap, outright.Only so much heat will be able to pass through and that will be drastically increasingly better at thin to nearly nonexistent films, rather than sizable gaps. That's why it isn't a "magic bullet".

Again with your scarecrow arguments.

This is to mean, you find yourself in a corner. It is entirely relevent to how heatsink pastes work, hence, it is not "scarecrow".

Indeed, it does matter for this particular situation, though it is understandable how you wish to ignore this point. Suit yourself, I suppose...

Says who? You? The largest chip is the GPU so of course it would give the most surface area for mounting the heatsink NO DUH. What does this have to do with anything? The heatsink is clampled down with screws.

So it comes down to the GPU is the one that gets the primary fit. All others are incidental. Hence, you've described a system, which upon closer examination, only needs to fit a heatsink square to one component. Now you're getting it!

You are clearly derailing the topic. Stay on topic. No one said anything about Sony in this topic. Save the inkjets, little squid.

Whoah first start with the insults. I guess you want to get banned and get slapped like the last time you tried to give your personal input.

You seem to take anything as an "insult" now. It was not. An inkjet is what a little squid does when it has become threatened. It murkies the waters and then splits. That is to describe an analogy to what you did in your response above. You felt cornered, so you burst out with what appears you intended to be something inflammatory about Sony hardware, where Sony had nothing at all to do with the topic. You weren't staying on-topic. You sprayed the inkjets, instead. Simple.

Revolution will have two separate CPUs and two separate GPUs?

It appears you are expecting some kind of hardware, to justify this big sell on a 4x heatsink mounted in a manufacturer problematic manner. This is all your assertion, not mine.

You don't seem to understand why the graphics card was brought up. It's not to show that it's the same as what exists in GCN.

It is once again your misunderstanding that, that is even what I was saying. This is why it is so difficult discussing with you. You consistently fail to understand what the other is saying, and then you generate these arguments based on your misinterpretations. It's not fruitful for anything, ultimately.

 

[Sonic]

PC-Engine, this is the second thread you caused to get locked since the console forum was reopened.

randy, you also contributed to this thread getting locked. The two of you need to stop going at it and start discussing things in a civil manner.