Yes but PS4 has it's 7th CPU usable at 100% vs 50-80% for XB1 so using an average of 65% in the end it's comparable to a roughly 3.9% overclock lead for XB1.Software comes under technology too. Not everything is about GPU flops or whatever.
Also: something something .... CPU ... something.
Yes but PS4 has it's 7th CPU usable at 100% vs 50-80% for XB1 so using an average of 65% in the end it's comparable to a roughly 3.9% overclock lead for XB1.
XB1 needs more training until she can fully unlock her core of Wonder!
Wait, when was it confirmed to be 100%? I myself only read that it was an unspecified percentage, but fixed compared to X1's variable usage.Yes but PS4 has it's 7th CPU usable at 100% vs 50-80% for XB1 so using an average of 65% in the end it's comparable to a roughly 3.9% overclock lead for XB1.
XB1 needs more training until she can fully unlock her core of Wonder!
The architectures are the same, so the software solutions to address each console's finite power in realising the developers' artistic vision are comparable. If Game A on Console 1 uses a fabulous volumetric lighting solution, then Game B on Console 2 with the same architecture has the same option. If that game doesn't implement that feature, it's either because the devs didn't like it in their aesthetic, or chose other priorities, or, something special, the devs of Game A pioneered the tech and we may look forwards to it appearing elsewhere later.
TO1886 wasn't particularly demanding compared to other titles last year. That didn't stop a lot of people from awarding it "best graphics of 2015".
Nothing official obviously. We have 2 unofficial sources from gaf members who are allegedly developers. One saying 2 modes (10% and 50%) are available since several months ago (and confirmed recently by 2 third parties, like for Dying light DLC) and the other saying 100% is available but only for first parties like a "Beta".
'Computationally expensive' has little to do with the discussion. It's about achieving an aesthetic with the best solutions one can find to work on the architecture available. So PS2 versus XB1 was difficult to compare because one used complex shaders and one used massive overdraw, and the software solutions were radically different. But on XB1 and PS4, the architectures are the same and the solutions the same, barring compute versus eDRAM BW. The visual comparison here should be of techniques and results, regardless how much or little processing power they require.
