D
Deleted member 13524
Guest
If they're getting rid of big.LITTLE, I wonder if Qualcomm will go back to quadcores for their flagship SoCs.
So this new chip is called S820 and features Kyro cores, whereas the S620 will have four A72s and four A53s. I guess this means Kyro is more powerful than A72, which would be quite an improvement over Krait. I can't wait to see how it all turns out.
"will begin sampling "on a leading edge FinFET process" in the second half of 2015. It should be in consumer devices by this time next year."
Why so vague ? Could be either 14 nm Samsung/GF or 16 nm TSMC. Actually learned today that 14nm Samsung/GF FinFET is FinFET transistors with a 20 nm backend (interconnect). Fast and efficient interconnect appearently requires new materials, which Samsung (and TSMC ??? ) didn't have the time for yet. So, 14nm @ Samsung is just a marketing name, likely it gives you the benefits of a half-node.
That's not a PowerVR product, it's Kryo, not KyroSo this new chip is called S820 and features Kyro cores, whereas the S620 will have four A72s and four A53s. I guess this means Kyro is more powerful than A72, which would be quite an improvement over Krait.
Same here. We were given so few details, very frustrating...I can't wait to see how it all turns out.
That's not a PowerVR product, it's Kryo, not Kyro
200-300mV reduction is hardly a half node. Don't really understand why people are ignoring the power and perf benefits so much just because the die shrink is only 15%.So, 14nm @ Samsung is just a marketing name, likely it gives you the benefits of a half-node.
I think not everyone is quite believing this is really all due to the new 14nm node, as opposed to samsung being lazy before and not properly optimizing it... That said if just half of it is really due to the new 14nm node this would already be quite a big deal...200-300mV reduction is hardly a half node. Don't really understand why people are ignoring the power and perf benefits so much just because the die shrink is only 15%.
I think not everyone is quite believing this is really all due to the new 14nm node, as opposed to samsung being lazy before and not properly optimizing it...
I wouldn't be so sure about that.The device goes on sale in a few days.
Unless HTC likes sending malfunctioning units for review testing...So.. that means it can't be a malfunctioning unit?
I expect the M9 to be cooler than its competitors using the same S810, due to the aluminum unibody being used as a heatspreader.
Unless HTC likes sending malfunctioning units for review testing...
There was nothing faulty about the Honor 6 in the end - the antenna just was horrible. I got only slightly better reception on the Mate 7 and other users of the Chinese version of the H6 had the same issues.It wouldn't be the first or the last time that a reviewer gets a faulty unit, or an early review sample with buggy software.
But you probably know better than I do about this M9 issue..
We'll see what HTC does, they're claiming it's a software issue. Which plainly means they're not throttling the SoC hard enough.