PS3: Lopsided and inefficient

I know someone
at ObiOneSoft
and she said that
PS3 > Xbox360 at physics
You see, if I have 3 slices of bread
and put them in a toaster
On Xbox360 they come out as toast
But on PS3, they don't come
out as toast. They come out as dried bread
It will look like toast, taste like toast
But the Xbox360 toast > PS3 dried bread.

 

The other thing people are talking about using the SPE array for is for hardware physics acceleration. If that pans out, it should have a nice size edge over X360 in processing power. Which is why Im not sure why she thinks X360 > PS3 at handling physics.

 

OpaOpa,

Something you might want to keep in mind: the PS2 was the least powerful and hardest to code-for system this gen, and it beat the competition by 4:1.

Regardless of whether or not it is general purpose or graphics focussed, it won't impact sales of the machine, especially if it has good games.

Assuming they're aiming for another 100,000,000 sales, I don't think any more than 0.1% of that market (if that) could even tell you which machine had a better internal design with less bottlenecks. And less than that care when they want to enjoy their games!

Anyway, back to it !

 

the amount spent on R&D for CELL.

 

This thread needs to be locked...lol..it will only bring up some pointless argument. I can't believe this thread survived two pages long.

 

not that I want to be seen siding with Opa but .....that's still a pretty BIG if.

 

Hey guys. Ep = Ek, 9.81 x mass is Force Newtons due to Earth Gravity.

And it didn't even take me 3.2 gigahertz to realize it.

If I had Ubi's phone number, I would let them know it too.

 

Opa opa, you are extremely wrong in your views. Stop spreading spam on the forum without actually backing up your claims.

You have just shown that you are a troll. Any more threads like this and you will be banned.