Possible Schematics for RSX to hit 1.8 TFLOP mark

[expletive]

LOL

Just jumping in now, if you read the first post and then skip down to the one before mine its hysterical to see where this thread went.

 

[PC-Engine]

Yep some people just don't get it...

In order for the RSX to hit 1.8TFLOP of total performance it has to be powered by dreams.

Yep you need more than "Powered by Honda".

 

[Master-Mold]

Directed at our more technical friends...

Could someone please provide a couple of possible RSX scenarios/layouts that would make for sony's claimed 1.8 Teraflop performance rating?

I'm interested in knowing how it is possible that they arrived at that number (or if it is reasonable given logical possiblities for layouts of the RSX).

1.21 Jiga-watts to the Flux capacitor.

 

[!eVo!-X Ant UK]

Normally aspirated we don't!

The new F1 V8's are 2.4litre NA, producing 750bhp.

so that meen's over 1000BHP with a garret T34 hybrid.........mmmmm

 

[London Geezer]

Silly me, i thought this thread and this forum was about consoles and 3D graphics!!

 

[LunchBox]

way to go to derail the thread!!!!

*gives a hand of applause*

 

[DuckThor Evil]

so that meen's over 1000BHP with a garret T34 hybrid.........mmmmm

Excuse me, but are you on crack.?

 

[MechanizedDeath]

Good to see the usual suspects have derailed another thread with the usual comments. And the flawed engine comparison was beaten to death already this summer. In any case, the figure is pointless, whether it's using hardwired ops or not. The programmable FLOPS figure is more useful, but still pretty pointless. Only good for a pissing match. PEACE.

 

[!eVo!-X Ant UK]

Excuse me, but are you on crack.?

what you meen???

 

[DuckThor Evil]

what you meen???

"whats with the engine caparison ???? there pointless. for Example

whats faster a 8ltre V8 or a 2 ltre V4 ???

The 2 litre by a very long way.

In the UK we get 700BHP, 2 litre engine's"



For starters.

 

[PC-Engine]

Good to see the usual suspects have derailed another thread with the usual comments. And the flawed engine comparison was beaten to death already this summer. In any case, the figure is pointless, whether it's using hardwired ops or not. The programmable FLOPS figure is more useful, but still pretty pointless. Only good for a pissing match. PEACE.

Read over the orignial engine example, because it looks like you didn't get it the first time.

 

[!eVo!-X Ant UK]

"whats with the engine caparison ???? there pointless. for Example

whats faster a 8ltre V8 or a 2 ltre V4 ???

The 2 litre by a very long way.

In the UK we get 700BHP, 2 litre engine's"



For starters.

Whats wrong with that???? that is purely an example of why doing such comparisons are pointless.

And we do get 700BHP engines in the UK, a.l.a Ford Escort RS cosworth

 

[_phil_]

allready discussed :
http://forums.automotive.com/commun...ord-windstar-has-a-high-speed-miss/index.html

 

[DuckThor Evil]

Whats wrong with that???? that is purely an example of why doing such comparisons are pointless.

And we do get 700BHP engines in the UK, a.l.a Ford Escort RS cosworth

Does it have a V-engine!? and if some guys have tuned up 2liter car to have 700hp, does it make it better or faster than 8liter V8, are you sure you couldn't possibly to tune the V8 to produce even more power than 700hp! I mean you can stick those turbos to other engines too you know. Besides 700 is not even close to any record from 2liter turbocharged engine. Your analyze of putting garret turbo to Formula one car was well... intresting.

 

[Farid]

Thread Locked

Do I really have to explain why?