Now I was the first to mention this, but if people look closely, I actually preceeded those remarks with an IF conditional statement! IF MS didn't have this in mind from early on, they would need hardware redesigns to add the technology now. Anyone disagree? Anyone think you can pick up a novel prcoessor and stick it into a spare space on the mobo and run a few wires across without designing it in?Acert93 said:I am not disagreeing, look above. I am not saying it will be, or wont be, in the X2. My point was that these statements that MS would have to reorganize their board and all that other stuff is silly.
That is, I cannot see that this PPU could be added now. I'm not saying, nor never did say, that it won't feature (we don't know the specs) but saying the potential for inclusion is dependant on prior knowledge from MS. As has been pointed out, there's reasons for AGEIA to be partnering MS other than through silicon, so simply saying AGEIA is a partner is circumstantial evidence to see this as a probable inclusion.
I have to say though, what's the point of including 3 fast PPC cores if graphics are handled by one PU and physics by another? That's an AWFUL lot of AI and sound processing if those PPCs are going to be fully utilised!