When I'm reading the word Sony more than the word Microsoft in the Microsoft E3 thread, things are going down the wrong path again.
I understand there's a desire here to discuss the two companies' 'revelation' strategies relative to one another, but since this thread is not a unified E3 conference thread (done obviously on purpose), it'd be nice if people could discuss what MS did well or could have done better on its own terms without bringing in Sony as a reference point that in turn begins to become the discussion itself.
Indeed, the next one bringing up the 2009 vs. 2008 argument which is a smokescreenish Sony vs. MS debate, will get spanked.