Nvidia Pascal Reviews [1080XP, 1080ti, 1080, 1070ti, 1070, 1060, 1050, and 1030]

However, if you want the very best and you want it right now, you can't do any better than the new Titan X based on Pascal. It is 15-40% faster than the GeForce GTX 1080 based on GP104, a card that took the flagship title itself just a little over a month ago! If you are an owner of a GTX 980 Ti, you'll find the Titan X to be a 40-80% performance improvement with the higher end of that range kicking in if you are playing at 4K.
Do we expect there to be a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti at some point that might split the difference between the GTX 1080 and the new Titan X? Yes. When? No idea - it could be next week the way NVIDIA is pumping out GPUs! If you would be pissed if a 12GB 1080 Ti was released in August with slightly less performance for $999 - don't buy the Titan X.
Click to expand...
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-Titan-X-Pascal-12GB-Graphics-Card-Review

Edit:
Evga is apparently working on a hybrid cooler for the Titan X Pascal.
http://forums.evga.com/FindPost/2520221
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here is a section that gets interesting. We overclocked by increasing the power target to 120 per cent and setting a 90°C temperature. The fan goes nuts (3,000rpm-plus) trying to keep the GP102 in a modicum of check.

Spec frequencies alone don't illuminate what's happening. The extra power target gives the Titan X room to breathe and really push the core. More power means a higher core speed, and our sample ran at very close to 2,000MHz when overclocked, which goes against what the above screengrab is telling you. Memory scaled to 11,000MHz, as well.
Click to expand...
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/95215-nvidia-titan-x-pascal/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hope their edit: PCPer's other calculations are correct:
"The rated 11 TFLOPS of single precision compute of the new Titan X is 34% higher than that of the GeForce GTX 1080 and I would expect gaming performance to scale in line with that difference." [...]
 
Last edited:
xpea said:
good review of Titan X (OC potential is higher than other Pascal models):
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...vidia-titan-x-12gb-performance-review-17.html
on water this thing will be on top of the chain for a long time...
Click to expand...

Well i hope, .. but if the headroom is obviously higher over the standard clock, due to the conservative one they have use, the question remain what is the maximum clock achievable over 2000mhz with the TDP limit at max ( 250+ 20% ). going to 1924mhz over 1500mhz is good, but it is in the range of 1080 actual clock. H2o temperature will have an impact, even on TDP, but not much if TDP limit is attained allready on air.( and as they was run at 62°C OC, i can imagine the problem for go higher was not the temperature )

Its obvious that Nvidia could have set a really higher default boost clock speed.

Dont misunderstand me, its excellent to see that with much more SP the gpu still achieve same clock of the 1080 - 1070 when OC. I just ask me if the OC will really scale with H20 that much ( untill a modded bios appears )
 
Last edited:
If nVidia wants to split the difference between the Titan X and the 1080 then maybe they'll consider the distance between the 1070 and the 1080. Afaik the 1070 has six eighths of the shaders of the 1080. Presumably nVidia could bin for seven eighths as well. Though there is no pressing need for that, I suppose. It's not like the jump up from a 1070 to such a part would open new gaming vistas.
IIRC we have the precedent of the GTX 680/670/660 Ti, and that of the AMD 5870/5850/5830 for companies getting maximum salvage out of an expensive product (though the 660 Ti was an odd, but very good, duck).
Edit: I forget if nVidia did this with the 4xxx, 5xxx, and 7xxx series as well. If they did, then is it odd that the tradition hasn't continued?
 
2050 on air so far getting 110-120 in witcher 3 from 65-75 on old titan x on water.
Click to expand...
http://www.overclock.net/t/1606562/titan-x-pascal-thread/350#post_25406315

Apparently Nvidia will be adding

Quad SLI support for 3DMark Fire Strike is not enabled in our current 369.05 driver for the new Titan X (Pascal). Support will be added in our next driver releasing later this month. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Click to expand...
http://www.overclock.net/t/1606562/titan-x-pascal-thread/350#post_25406301
 
1080 FE runs at 10% higher frequencies and is 5-15% (BF4,Witcher3) more energy efficient than Titan X(Pascal).
How come?
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/935-4/consommation-efficacite-energetique.html

getgraphimg.php
 
My take on it, apart from what was already mentioned, is that the Titan, when compared to the 1080, gets most of its speedup from memory intensive tasks, compared to the 1080 which gets more performance from compute intensive workloads, relatively speaking. Memory is substantially less efficient than compute units, at least according to Nvidia, so that results in lower overall efficiency.
 
On overclockers they are refer to Pascal Titan X as "Titan XP".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rys
GPUDB integration FAQ
Replies
8
Views
3K
kaiser77_1982
K
BRiT
PSA: EVGA Cards using Nvidia 1080 and 1070 catching on fire
Replies
4
Views
3K
DuckThor Evil
DuckThor Evil
S
Pascal vs. Maxwell - a Generational Performance Comparison & Analysis
Replies
19
Views
14K
Kaotik
Kaotik
A
GP102/GP100 FP16 support vs. Performance in old DirectX 8 and DirectX 9
Replies
12
Views
5K
Razor1
R
R
Building a PC with XB1X specs *spawn
Replies
10
Views
3K
Blazkowicz
B
Back
Top