There are no waterblocks for this card yet so I just have it on the stock air cooler for now, haven't had a chance to do anything more than install it and the latest driver, haven't even run a single benchmark or game yet but it's waiting for me when I get home... OC potential looks good so far from what I've seen from other enthusiasts @ overclock.net with many achieving core clocks beyond 2GHz, almost all above 1900MHz (and usually sustained at that). Just need better cooling and the ability to raise the power limit and these cards will be absolutely bananas.
Nvidia Pascal Reviews [1080XP, 1080ti, 1080, 1070ti, 1070, 1060, 1050, and 1030]
- Thread starter Love_In_Rio
- Start date
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
I think EK starts shipping their waterblock on Aug 16.
EK Launches NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal Water Blocks
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/ek-launches-nvidia-titan-x-pascal-water-blocks.html
That is correct. I pre-ordered mine yesterday. When I say "there are no waterblocks" I mean there are none in customers' hands.
Looks like Nvidia reduced the SM's geometry throughput down to 3 cycles again, just like in GM200.
Just want to make sure I'm following you, are you saying they've increased latency for triangle throughput?
I don't know what you mean with reduced. Kepler were all 1 tri every 2 cycles per smx. All Paxwell chips are 1 tri every 3 clocks per smm (I believe including the P100, albeit the rate there would be per TPC).
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
08/04/2016
Full review available at gamestar.de
http://www.gamestar.de/hardware/gra..._rev_20,1010,3276696,2.html#spiele-benchmarks
Techpowerup Titan XP review:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/Titan_X_Pascal/
Full review available at gamestar.de
http://www.gamestar.de/hardware/gra..._rev_20,1010,3276696,2.html#spiele-benchmarks
Techpowerup Titan XP review:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/Titan_X_Pascal/
Last edited by a moderator:
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Tweaktown Titan X review
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/78...er-performance-4k-60fps-single-gpu/index.html
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/78...er-performance-4k-60fps-single-gpu/index.html
Last edited by a moderator:
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Kitguru: Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) 12GB Review
http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/nvidia-titan-x-pascal-12gb-review/
http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/nvidia-titan-x-pascal-12gb-review/
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Corsair launches Hydro GFX GTX 1080 liquid cooled graphics card
http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics...dro-gfx-gtx-1080-liquid-cooled-graphics-card/Corsair has launched the Hydro GFX GTX 1080 liquid cooled graphics card. This all in one liquid cooled graphics card is based upon the sleek melding of an MSI designed GTX 1080 graphics card with a Corsair Hydro Series H55.
A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y
Veteran
Tom's Hardware has updated the power demand of the Pascal Titan card: http://www.tomshardware.de/nvidia-titan-x-2016-12gb-pascal,testberichte-242164-7.html
Means using some kind of translation if looking at more than the graphs.
Pretty much in line with previous Nvidia cards in terms of power traits, just a shame they could not test overclocking but peak normal use shows how efficient it is, although trend wise it is less so relative to Titan X/980 card comparison; In terms of efficiency the Maxwell Titan X was much better relative to 980 where here the Pascal Titan X is using more power for its gains relative to the 1080FE.
50ms is inconsequential in terms of extra demand it puts on spec as applied to PC GPUs/connectors.
The previous Maxwell Titan X in game was measured at 224W at Tom's Hardware:
In terms of power demand-performance, it can be seen how this time round the 1080FE and Pascal Titan diverge from each other.
I assume the much higher clock speed for the Pascal Titan with its greater GPC and (associated architecture components such as Polymorph Engines/etc) having the impact, but this does not translate to a massive gap in performance between 1080FE and the Pascal Titan, which was more apparent with previous Maxwell 2 Titan X/980 when taking in consideration power demand-clock speed-etc.
Cheers
Means using some kind of translation if looking at more than the graphs.
Pretty much in line with previous Nvidia cards in terms of power traits, just a shame they could not test overclocking but peak normal use shows how efficient it is, although trend wise it is less so relative to Titan X/980 card comparison; In terms of efficiency the Maxwell Titan X was much better relative to 980 where here the Pascal Titan X is using more power for its gains relative to the 1080FE.
50ms is inconsequential in terms of extra demand it puts on spec as applied to PC GPUs/connectors.
The previous Maxwell Titan X in game was measured at 224W at Tom's Hardware:
In terms of power demand-performance, it can be seen how this time round the 1080FE and Pascal Titan diverge from each other.
I assume the much higher clock speed for the Pascal Titan with its greater GPC and (associated architecture components such as Polymorph Engines/etc) having the impact, but this does not translate to a massive gap in performance between 1080FE and the Pascal Titan, which was more apparent with previous Maxwell 2 Titan X/980 when taking in consideration power demand-clock speed-etc.
Cheers
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
Hexus Review: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (Asus ROG G752VS)
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/laptop/95650-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-mobile-asus-rog-g752vs/
D
Deleted member 2197
Guest
HEXUS Review: Inno3D GeForce GTX 1070 iChiLL X3
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/95485-inno3d-geforce-gtx-1070-ichill-x3/
Last edited by a moderator:
A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y
Veteran
Any links to reviews on the GTX 1060 3GB model?
None yet. NV didn't sample any cards to the press. Reviews will come when partners themselves sample cards for review. FWIW NV claims the difference in performance is ~5% between the 6GB and 3GB cards but take that with an appropriate dose of salt.
I am inclined to believe that with the caveat, the HUGE caveat, that it's true only as long as the 3 GiB vidmem suffice. And we know that even 4 GiB-SKUs are struggling in a few titles in 1080p already. Now it could be reasoned that people going for cheaper cards are not as adamant on keeping all settings at max, but I'm not sure if I want to follow where that road leads to.
Agree..I didn't state that because I thought it was obvious. The VRAM will be a problem..and even if not today..we have to take into account future games. The 2GB GTX 960 is a prime example of this.
Similar threads
