GK110 will be in the GTX690 and there will be no dual chip card this round?GTX680 has a GK104 afaik and that's a performance and not a high end chip. As to why they've decided to name it "680" Lord knows what marketing had in mind.
GK110 will be in the GTX690 and there will be no dual chip card this round?
or GK110 is a dual GK104.. the plot thickens!
GK110 will be in the GTX690 and there will be no dual chip card this round?
I don't think folks like Gipsel are as naive to believe your irritating jokes
There's always GTX695 if needed or 699
I seem to recall a GTS prefix in some of that really fake rumor/slides/chart from a month or so back.
I've been pinching myself for a few minutes now, but it looks like Charlie is indeed saying very good things about Kepler: http://semiaccurate.com/2012/01/19/nvidia-kepler-vs-amd-gcn-has-a-clear-winner/
He's wrong.
Seriously though, 256 bit bus? What kind of trick could be used there to make it work so well?
High mem clocks, larger caches, better compression, finer grained access (8x32 vs. 4x64)? Seriously though, if GK104 is supposed to be the mainstream part, I'm guessing he just means it'll win against whatever GCN part also has a 256 bit bus (78xx?).
Maybe they're using XDR2 after all?
That's not very newsworthy. GF114 is faster than Barts too in a mainstream showdown. The only way nVidia wins anything "handily" is to be well ahead on some metric - perf/$, perf/w or just overall performance.
The chip is quite small, and has 8 GDDR5 chips meaning a 256-bit bus/2GB standard, and several other features we can’t talk about yet due to differences between the cards seen. These items won’t change the outcome though, Nvidia wins, handily.