The steam numbers are largely meaningless. In the past 3-4 years I've owned 2x4870, 4x5870, 6x5850, 4x6950, 4x6970 and now 4x7970s and not once I've opted in for their hardware survey. The only thing that the survey measures is the desire to show off your purchases.
Very short PCB for a $399 high-end product: http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1894715-1-1.html
As if we needed any more evidence of nVidia's original intentions for GK104.
This sort of situation only ruins their results if people who tend to buy certain sorts of hardware are also more likely to opt-out of the hardware survey.The steam numbers are largely meaningless. In the past 3-4 years I've owned 2x4870, 4x5870, 6x5850, 4x6950, 4x6970 and now 4x7970s and not once I've opted in for their hardware survey. The only thing that the survey measures is the desire to show off your purchases.
Tridam's just published an article about GPU Boost, revisited: http://www.hardware.fr/focus/65/gpu-boost-gtx-680-double-variabilite.html
Basically, his press sample was qualified up to 1110MHz while retail cards may be limited to 1097, 1084, 1071, or perhaps as low as 1058MHz. So he benched a random retail card against his press sample, measured a 1.5% difference on average, up to 5% in Anno 2070.
Original, perhaps, but it has nothing to do with AMD delivered, or do you really think nVidia planned on sitting on the market without highend for what, 3 quarters?
As far as I can tell there are getting less 680's as time goes on, not more.
Never seen anything remotely like this. I feel like if another company had done this, there'd be no end to the world-is-ending kvetching over it. But this, people dont even talk about in a negative way.
As far as I can tell there are getting less 680's as time goes on, not more.
Never seen anything remotely like this. I feel like if another company had done this, there'd be no end to the world-is-ending kvetching over it. But this, people dont even talk about in a negative way.
Have you tried to buy one and weren't able to do so? What do you want people to be negative about? All the people (on this board) who seem very concerned aren't even trying to purchase a 680.....
Hard evidence of decent volumes (Steam) is quickly dismissed but we should be kvetching over what exactly?
As if we needed any more evidence of nVidia's original intentions for GK104.Very short PCB for a $399 high-end product: http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-1894715-1-1.html
You had a problem with the 7970 volumes
Improvements in micro-stutter and great to see:
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/...dia-geforce-gtx-690/8/#abschnitt_mikroruckler
Looks like it. The sample computerbase.de had hit 1020-1050 Mhz almost all the time. A 993 MHz hiccup in Anno 2070 was the lowest clock observed.Hmm, is there a performance plateau on the 680s around 1000mhz? What happened to the 10% difference in core clock? Is it simply that the TDP is much lower than the 300W limit that the 690 GPUs are being upclocked anyway?