NVIDIA GT200 Rumours & Speculation Thread

Discussion in 'Architecture and Products' started by Arun, Feb 10, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. apoppin

    Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Hi Desert SoCal
    from TG daily, i linked above:

    referring to the memory controller
    GT200 looks to be a monster! i just somehow know they will break 1 TFLOPs with their top performer
    .. it is marketing-driven to do so, as a "milestone" for a single GPU! [imo]
     
    #1301 apoppin, May 21, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: May 21, 2008
  2. nutball

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    2,492
    Likes Received:
    979
    Location:
    en.gb.uk
    Calculate based on what if you don't mind me asking?
     
  3. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    I remember when the term MT/s used to mean millions of triangles per second. Amazing it now means millions of textures processed per second :shock:
     
  4. trinibwoy

    trinibwoy Meh
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Messages:
    12,059
    Likes Received:
    3,119
    Location:
    New York
    I think that was supposed to be a joke.....

    Given that Nvidia promised a teraflop I'm thinking this is feasible:

    16 clusters
    2 x 8 SP multiprocessors / cluster
    3 flops / SP (explains the +50%)
    8 TF / cluster
    500-600Mhz core clock
    1300Mhz shader clock

    Geforce products with 15 clusters enabled - 930 Gflops
    Tesla products with 16 clusters enabled - 1 Teraflop

    Of course we still have no idea how the clusters are really configured or how clocks will turn out....
     
  5. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    Uhhhmm.....

    I definitely need sources to speculate of any X amount of anything :roll:
     
  6. Ailuros

    Ailuros Epsilon plus three
    Legend Subscriber

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    9,511
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Chania
    I'm extremely bad with any bets, but my gut feeling tells me that the [10*(8*3)] theory makes more sense.
     
  7. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    just throwing it out there but how different is the 260 from the 280 besides the 448 bit bus...
    and when they shut down the cores couldn't you theoretically "turned on" them or do they do something to prevent this?
     
  8. chiadog

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Search for softmod. If the circuits are physically disabled via laser, then there is nothing you could do.
     
  9. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    dude did you join just to answer that?, anyway your talking software solutions aren't there any hardware solutions to undo it?, like physically going to the graphics card



    (btw junior member FTW!!!!!!!)
     
  10. ShaidarHaran

    ShaidarHaran hardware monkey
    Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    90
    He already answered your question...

    If it's physically disabled, you aren't going to re-enable it. If it were simple, it would be done. There's a reason 8800 GTS 640 cards couldn't be magically transformed into essentially 8800 GTXs with less RAM.
     
  11. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    ummm first off no not entirely he gave me a software option and never said anything about hardware
    and second i know that im just talking could it be done period i don't remember saying that i wanted it to be easy....
     
  12. 3dilettante

    Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8,579
    Likes Received:
    4,799
    Location:
    Well within 3d
    Physically disabling units with a laser (or blowing an e-fuse by other means) rules out hardware methods of modding the hardware back--or at least it does for those without an electron microscope and the hardware lab needed to redraw lines in the silicon.
     
  13. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    there we go thank you thats all i wanted to know so it costs more to fix the problem than it does to just buy the higher end product
     
  14. 3dilettante

    Legend Alpha

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    8,579
    Likes Received:
    4,799
    Location:
    Well within 3d
    The other post mentioned the use of a laser, or at least did when I read it.
    I just elaborated a little.

    Chip manufacturers went to greater lengths to prevent softmods and things like jumper or resistor changes in later chips.
     
  15. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    yes but the little bit of elaboration you provided answered my question completely

    yep technology has come a long way:wink:
    i still remember when 16mb of ram was godly
     
  16. Chris123234

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those answers tend to come out after the cards are sold and people are able to test them. Hence, the soft mod or laser cutting answer. Also, you are very patronizing in your replies.
     
  17. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    yeah i feel bad about that... little frustrated this morning didn't me to take it out on you guys:sad:
     
  18. HAL

    HAL
    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    2
  19. tacopaco

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    indiana
    those specs are pretty good seem pretty realistic
    1.1 TFlops sound right
     
  20. fellix

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,552
    Likes Received:
    514
    Location:
    Varna, Bulgaria
    Hmm... So, it's 24 SPs per eight TMUs, e.g. dual 12-wide SIMD per cluster?
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...