The G92 Architecture Rumours & Speculation Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
v_rr said:
That whould be a litle stupid because they are losing lot of market just because they don´t have DX_10.1 suport/sticker in the box.
Click to expand...
A lot of overtime for AIBs/distributors... :LOL:


v_rr said:
So take your conclusions. Things should be very clear since day one, not like that way.
Click to expand...
Sure, but why not this time, when NV was in past usual in front of supporting latest D3D features? :???:

And there is still this slide, which states D3D10.1 is supported:
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/9934/g8xdx101di8.jpg

All a bit strange...

NonNative said:
Its possible that they didnt support dx10.1 in 8800GT now its becuase it will affected the marketing of GTX and Ultra.
Click to expand...
But D3D10.1 would be the final advantage against same priced RV670-SKUs.
 
Once they have phased out all the G80 cores, they can enable it through the hardware as the new G92 based 8800 series fill the top?

Quite a slap in the face for Ultra/GTX owners really.

Adding insult to injury they start marketing the 8800 series are capable of DX10.1as soon as G80s are discontinued :LOL:
 
Twinkie said:
Once they have phased out all the G80 cores, they can enable it through the hardware as the new G92 based 8800 series fill the top?

Quite a slap in the face for Ultra/GTX owners really.

Adding insult to injury they start marketing the 8800 series are capable of DX10.1as soon as G80s are discontinued :LOL:
Click to expand...

"Discontinued" doesn't mean "Disconnected".
For instance, even the latest FW 169.01 support the old GeforceFX family (at least in WinXP).
 
In the VR-Zone review, what do they mean when they mention the number of pixel and vertex processors? I thought the G92 is unified. If they're merely doing a division for maximal number of equivalent units on a previous gen. architecture, why do they come up w/ fewer vertex processors in ratio to the G80?
 
Raqia said:
In the VR-Zone review, what do they mean when they mention the number of pixel and vertex processors? I thought the G92 is unified. If they're merely doing a division for maximal number of equivalent units on a previous gen. architecture, why do they come up w/ fewer vertex processors in ratio to the G80?
Click to expand...

They got mixed up with the ROP's, i think.
Just a minor typo.
 
Oh and if 128 SP's is indeed the core maximum and the new GTS is to take 128 SP's, then that might lead credence to the idea that a dual G92 GX2 type card with 1TF power is the next step until a new generation of video cards...
 
Does anyone have any info on the other SKUs for the G92 ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Rys
Reopening Architecture and Products + rules and guidelines changes
3 4 5
Replies
90
Views
13K
Shifty Geezer
Shifty Geezer
R
Gaming and gaming hardware trends
2
Replies
23
Views
931
Remij
R
R
Let's discuss the ways the future console architectures could potentially improve in efficiency
2 3
Replies
52
Views
5K
Miniature Kaiju
M
hoom
AMD: Zen 4, Speculation, Rumours and Discussion
8 9 10
Replies
199
Views
35K
MfA
M
I
The first Evil Within still has remarkably sophisticated lighting
Replies
2
Views
479
Phantom88
P
Back
Top