Here is the leaked review http://futuremark.yougamers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83241
177.34s are around
"There are no significant performance differences between this driver and 177.26."
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX_280_Preview/5872.html
Vr-zone has their GTX280 is up!
http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX_280_Preview/5872.html
Vr-zone has their GTX280 is up!
Because it has twice as many transistors, twice the memory bus and buffer size, and yet performance somewhat worse in some benchmarks, perhaps??
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news.php?news=2151
FW 177.26
Crysis 19x12 no AA high details
GTX260 - 34.56fps
GTX280 - 38.75fps
Crysis 19x12 no AA very high details
GTX260 - 26.55fps
GTX280 - 29.31fps
FW177.34
Crysis 19x12 no AA high details
GTX260 - 43.90
GTX280 - 48.55fps
Crysis 19x12 no AA very high details
GTX260 - 37.35
GTX280 - 42.80fps
And there are SLi numbers too.
LOL, it's a fake done by an italian guy...
http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpost.php?p=22900939&postcount=5451
In this post he said he did through MS Paint.
No way thay can get such an increase with only a new release of drivers...
Fuck me, I would expect this kind of response after a personal attack.How the fuck is a single chip performing slightly above the level of a GX2 (without all the nasty side effects which come from AFR rendering) underwhelming?
LOL, it's a fake done by an italian guy...
http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpost.php?p=22900939&postcount=5451
In this post he said he did through MS Paint.
No way thay can get such an increase with only a new release of drivers...
spajdr said:What you mean FAKE? that first picture is actually mine i posted here lol
EDIT.: oh you mean SLI tests, well from what i can compare with one card, its pretty accurate.
spajdr said:Crysis demo 1920x1200 HIGH .. no AA - Forceware 177.34
Play Time: 43.09s, Average FPS: 46.42
Min FPS: 35.90 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 57.24 at frame 1014
VERY HIGH is tragedy, so i leave it to review with full version