Nvidia G-SYNC

I think they are 144Hz top atm.
Honestly if you go faster, just throttle your game ;p
(Well or drop frames or whatever...)

 

It works exactly as vsync there, it locks to the (maximum) refresh rate.

 

Thanks everyone. So the higher your monitor refresh rate the better since it gives you more head room for increased frame rates but you never have to worry about going over that refresh rate and tearing since the the GPU would wait for the next monitor refresh to send the next frame once you hit the ceiling.

So very similar to adaptive vsync with the advantage that below the monitors max refresh rate you'll see no tearing. Apparently stuttering is also experienced below the refresh rate with vsync off but this isn't something I've personally noticed (playing all games with vsync off on a 120hz monitor).

 

Has anyone commented on what perks (or limitations?) this will bring to SLI?

 

SLI's microsttuter is gone. Other than that, I can't see any impacts off-the-cuff.

 

Shouldn't it just display SLI stutter with high fidelity, with no tearing or futher induced stutter? Or that sentence can be ignored, as I don't account for SLI frame pacing.

 

gone due to frame pacing or g.sync?

 

The differing latencies for alternate frames in SLI are gone. There will be no tearing with gsync, ever.

The driver doesn't need to artificially delay half the frames anymore.

 

Well, GPU B releases a frame at t0 = 0 ms, GPU A releases a frame at time t1=15ms, GPU B releases a frame at t2=30, then GPU A has a hard, long frame to render : it goes out at t3=57 but GPU B puts out its frame at t4=62.. Now if every frame takes 30ms again from now on, aren't frames from GPU A and B virtually locked at 5ms from each other?
That'll give you a jerky and slow picture while the framerate counter is happy showing a big number.

That's what I understand from the situation.. G-Sync alone gives excellent, tear-free jumpy stuttered framerate.

 

After the first spike, the fps counter stays stable at 33fps.

As far as interleaved slow and a fast refreshes are concerned, there is nothing the gsync can do about it. Removing it won't fix the problems either.

 

Well I don't know how much the FPS counter would really work but averaged that will be 66fps (30ms between one GPU's two frames, so two frames per 30 ms)

Found a framerate graph to illustrate the issue, in v-sync off


Red is GeForce DDR, blue is ATI Rage Fury Maxx

 

Has anyone seen this?
http://techreport.com/discussion/24...nvidia-frame-capture-tools?post=719842#719842

March 2013..

 

Really
What the FCAT
Where the FCAT you been?

 

I think ToTTenTranz was pointing to a particular comment related to GSync (note the date), not the article content itself.

 

Yes, it's a direct link to the comment, not the article.

It's a guy in March 2013 who says "hey, what if we did something.. let's call it GSync to solve this" and then proceeds to describe nVidia's G-Sync.

 

wow....

 

Yes.
I'm wondering how/why this hasn't got viral. Yet.

 

Ha bizarre!

 

I ask me if this guy work for Asus or Nvidia ( lol if it is the case, some comment of his post should have make laugh him like never, i imagine the guy who work on G-sync and who got response as it is impossible, it will not work lol.

 

I don't think so.
I just happened to stumble on this post from the same user in the comments to Anandtech's review of the R9 290X:

It's just that no one paid attention to it.