NVIDIA Fermi: Architecture discussion

Honestly, seeing some reactions here, it's almost like some people have never witnessed a graphics card launch ever again. "OOOHH give us a release date!" "Release all the facts!!" "They are beaten without even releasing hardware"

...and so on and so forth.

Not a long ago, people were predicting doom and gloom for ATI. Now it's nVIDIA's turn to sink. Maybe in a year we'll be back to dissing ATI. And then nVIDIA again. And so on and so forth. But it's fun, I'll give you that; in more ways that you think actually

 

Very true, been happening since Ati got serious with 9700 I guess and actually became a competitor to take over from 3dFX.

I don't see the point much in a photo though, I'd rather see just see those leaked cherry picked powerpoint slides showing the performance difference. Now that is something to argue over

 

This analysis doesn't seem to show anything useful with respect to gaming performance (at least without looking at other performance metrics too).

For example:

5870 / 4870

Pixel: 27200 <-> 12000; 2,27:1
Texel: 68000 <-> 30000; 2,27:1


So by this logic, the 5870 (having both a huge advantage over 4870 in the areas above AND in terms of pure FLOPS) should be walking all over 4870, right? We all know why this is not the case.....many other metrics need to be considered too.

 

The mb seems to be at the edge of the table.
What really intrigues me is the right inwards side of the fan, its like as if theres a hole pierced in the pcb under the fan, odd?

 

Why would NVIDIA bother to show off [gaming] framerates right now? The drivers are not ready, so performance at this stage may be great but still not optimal. Also, no point in letting much out of the bag right now with respect to gaming performance considering the highly competitive nature of the business, and considering that consumers will not get cards in their hands for at least a couple months.

What NVIDIA needs to do is to surprise and even delight gamers. Think G80, NV40, etc. We'll see what happens soon I suppose.

 

Yeah, but not with actual framerates, but with percentage differences! Now that rules. One game runs at 10fps with one card, 15fps with the other. OMG 50% difference

 

So these "extremists" are neliz and which 2 or 3 other people?

 

Fair enough. My point was Intel can waffle along with Larrabee for at least another year and not be financially affected by it. Nvidia not so much with Fermi.

It looks to be hardly on the table at all. So assuming it is dangling at the edge, pretty sloppy testing going on. I would never have a motherboard half off the edge of a bench, especially considering that is supposed to be Fermi running there, no doubt a rare card.

 

Hah

 

You've obviously never been to a computer lab before And as far as rare cards are concerned, they are rare for you and me, but not so much for the companies. They don't have plenty of them, but there always are working prototypes months before the release of the card. I remember when I was working for AMD, and went to England's HQ for the first time, I got to see a 3870X2 4-5 months before it was released. I was like OMGOMG, whereas the others were like "meeeeeh, when will the Amerikanski send us some proper drivers for this thing?"

 

Relax man. NVIDIA posted a press release on their website which stated that Fermi-based GeForce cards are expected to be available for purchase sometime during Q1 '10 (calendar year). Even though turnaround time is two or three months more than NVIDIA wanted, this still seems almost infinitely better than Intel.

 

Fermi, graphics at the edge of reality™

 

If you look at the Tesla picture. It has something similar.

http://www.computerbase.de/bildstrecke/27497/3/

Nvidia has done this with its 295 and 9800GX2 cards as well because it allows airflow in from the back.

 

Wasn't aware of that design, thanks for clarifying.
Now the tinfoil hat won't grow on me head

 

Precisely. It was not possible to verify that that was a real card DX11 card. No DX11 demo...nothing...and IIRC they even used the same demo for the HD 4800 launch. yet there was little mention of it being fake. Only in one of TechReport's podcasts did Scott mention that possibility.

Agreed!

 

I can comment on the HardOCP forum's "reaction"...Ever since AMD has launched the HD 5800 series, that it's practically impossible to start a discussion about NVIDIA products there, without that particular thread being flooded by the same old AMD die hard fanatics, that just ruin it to the point of it being closed. I was (and sort of still am) a regular there, but I don't post as much, because of that fact. And also the fact that despite reports, after offenses and even harrasement by some of these fanatical members, the mods do practically nothing and those people roam free to do what they want without consequence.
The video cards sub-forum there is pretty much just flamebait, disinformation and doom and gloom nowadays.

 

Wow -- what kind of resize filter did you use for that?

 

Perhaps we need to stem this tide? Yes?

I suggest to the mods here that a spin off about how Nvidia should/should not conduct themselves is in order. That way the speculation as to where/when Fermi is can be surgically removed from discussions about how Nvidia goes about their business.

Btw if that team has a sense of humour they'd take the Nvidia GPU out and replace it with an AMD model (which they should have) and post some more pictures.

 

Wow. Still debating a teaser shot on Twitter?

 

That's my point exactly. This picture (and really I have no problems with the picture itself but the context in which it was presented and how) has nothing of that. The reasons why it has nothing are not important and/or entirely understandable, like you said: drivers not ready, etc. etc.

Mod hat on: I recommend people dial down the conspiracy theories, mindless-speculation and leading questions. If you have unshakable proof of photochopping or whatever fine, but this isn't a thread for (over)analysing pictures some guy took with his cellphone.