boxleitnerb
Regular
Do we honestly think that is true? 
GK110 is around 550 mm2, not 502 mm2.
GK110 is around 550 mm2, not 502 mm2.
Nvidia BigK GK110 Kepler Speculation Thread
- Thread starter A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nvidia
Since this time there's a picture of the card, I at least hope it's true, because the score is actually higher than 7100 and that would mean cards prices will drop big time.
You are stating it's fake because GPU-Z, which is a hand-written database, is not recognizing the actual die size of the chipset?
boxleitnerb
Regular
These pictures show K20, not Titan.
And X7000 is impossible, Nvidia cannot do magic
And X7000 is impossible, Nvidia cannot do magic
boxleitnerb
Regular
Even if, please explain how Nvidia can more than double performance and only increase TDP by about 50%. Bandwidth isn't really that important in 3DMark11, but at +120% compute power, only +50-60% bandwidth should begin to bottleneck, too.
boxleitnerb
Regular
Of course not. It was a hypothetical calculation assuming the X7300 score was true (which it is not).
UniversalTruth
Veteran
GEFORCE GTX 780 vs Radeon HD 8970 - A preliminary review
Hope you like these results better.
Honestly, I don't know what to think but I really hope it will be the real deal because only in this case we will see a movement in this so slow and boring part of the market.
And some time ago we said that 7970 was an epic fail, it would be the proof of it. After all, 7970 can only compete with what was supposed to be a 660 Ti.
Hope you like these results better.
Honestly, I don't know what to think but I really hope it will be the real deal because only in this case we will see a movement in this so slow and boring part of the market.
And some time ago we said that 7970 was an epic fail, it would be the proof of it. After all, 7970 can only compete with what was supposed to be a 660 Ti.
boxleitnerb
Regular
This waiting is going on my nerves. I'm afraid we'll all be a bit underwhelmed by Titan, considering how much hype exists about it.
Lol@the review.
Lol@the review.
GEFORCE GTX 780 vs Radeon HD 8970 - A preliminary review
Hope you like these results better.
Honestly, I don't know what to think but I really hope it will be the real deal because only in this case we will see a movement in this so slow and boring part of the market.
And some time ago we said that 7970 was an epic fail, it would be the proof of it. After all, 7970 can only compete with what was supposed to be a 660 Ti.
I will like it if peoples have allready a 8970 for test ...
Last edited by a moderator:
Running it through google translate, they're doing their "measurements" based on leaked specs and extrapolating the final results using current gen results + leaked specs
It's fake
These pictures show K20, not Titan.
And X7000 is impossible, Nvidia cannot do magic
What about overclocked????
If you run a titan on liquid nitrogen and jolt enough volts through the chip to wake frankenstein's monster the sky's probably the limit as far as performance is concerned, but I'm sure people here are talking stock numbers, otherwise it's impossible to have any kind of reasonable discussion.
boxleitnerb
Regular
Again, memory bandwidth. How sensitive is 3DMark11 exactly to this? Titan would need 430 GB/s to have the same compute power/bandwidth ratio as GK104. 430 GB/s would require close to 9 Gbps memory speeds, that simply are not possible in my opinion.
UniversalTruth
Veteran
I don't think there is anything funny about it given that in the end those results draw a pretty clear picture what to expect. Or perhaps you expect something very different?
I think you should stop posting dumb things and littering your posts with smileys. I also think that unless the level of your contributions goes up your presence here will come under consideration.
Similar threads
