Nvidia BigK GK110 Kepler Speculation Thread
- Thread starter A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y
- Start date
-
- Tags
- nvidia
Superlinear performance over a 680/690, but almost the same performance profile as a OC 690 in all 4 gametests? http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4814338 
UniversalTruth
Veteran
Pretty unlikely but amazing if true! I'm guessing 6GB would be the standard memory configuration of such a beast. I guess this is what you pick up if you wanna play next gen consoles games at 1080p/60fps in 3D
1080p gets pretty boring already, guys. Why don't we already demand Ultra HD resolution gaming. Let's wake up AMD and NV from their so long sleep and doing nothing!
1080p gets pretty boring already, guys. Why don't we already demand Ultra HD resolution gaming. Let's wake up AMD and NV from their so long sleep and doing nothing!
If displays >1080p native resolutions would be way more affordable. If there should be a wake up call I'd start with the monitor vendors first.
boxleitnerb
Regular
So 2880 FPUs@800MHz beat 3072 FPUs@915MHz? Don't think so. I think your calculation is off. Titan would have to clock at 1155 MHz to achieve the 7107.
But as someone has found out, it is a fake anyway. It's a GTX 690 overclocked.
But as someone has found out, it is a fake anyway. It's a GTX 690 overclocked.
Except that your calculation is flawed.. should be 915*3072/5800*7100/2880 = 1194mhz ... and that a 690 is not running 915mhz in 3d11.
Btw.. I can now confirm it's fake, just got our sample in, and it scores much less:
A1xLLcqAgt0qc2RyMz0y
Veteran
Your score of X3550 seems to be way too low. It is only 11% higher than the GTX680. Since the rumor is that the Titan is to be priced at $899 and be 85% the performance of the GTX690 a number around 5000 should be expected.
Except that your calculation is flawed.. should be 915*3072/5800*7100/2880 = 1194mhz ... and that a 690 is not running 915mhz in 3d11.
Btw.. I can now confirm it's fake, just got our sample in, and it scores much less:
Point being, what is the actual evidence that picture being a 780 (no, that text can't say gtx titan either) and not 690?
Is that your result Psycho? If yes then it should be possible to find that supposed Titan result in futermark's database. Yet i cant find it.
Someone posted on Guru3D, this " work " of the screenshoot ... I let you zoom, but i see a 690.. ( ofc if the guy have not trafficate the screenshoot )
I guess that settles it, then.
P.S.: trafiquer => tamper with.
Trafficate is not a word.
I guess that settles it, then.
P.S.: trafiquer => tamper with.
Trafficate is not a word.
Lol i will try remember it thanks.
Dunno, looks like it, I just grabbed a good 680 OC result from google image search and edited info out
But just because the test has run, and maybe even submitted to the ORB, you don't have to make it public or even keep it, so nothing strange in that you can't find it.
Btw.. I really can't get that 690 out of the original jpg, so not sure the image processing above isn't faked too.
Last edited by a moderator:
I apologize, usually I'm good at equations, but I got up early and missed that.
a little more info on the geforce titan
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/GeForce-Titan-GK110-GTX690,20797.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/GeForce-Titan-GK110-GTX690,20797.html
Not more infos, it is the same story by the same " source "... ( Who have been given by WCCF. but at the base it is PCinlife/RedQuasar ( same admin site if im right ).
They just post it, cause everybody have post this story..
A user on italian forum reports interesting words by rivatuner's creator http://www.hwupgrade.it/forum/showpost.php?p=38966782&postcount=4095
Similar threads
