3070 launch delayed from 15th to 29th: https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-pushes-geforce-rtx-3070-launch-back-to-october-29th
Jebaited! -Nvidia
3070 launch delayed from 15th to 29th: https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-pushes-geforce-rtx-3070-launch-back-to-october-29th
3070 launch delayed from 15th to 29th: https://videocardz.com/newz/nvidia-pushes-geforce-rtx-3070-launch-back-to-october-29th
Was the review date delayed too? The upside for Nvidia is that AMD won't be able to use the 3070 in their marketing materials on the 28th. They will be forced to compare to Turing or Big Ampere and won't have the opportunity to crap all over the 3070.
Keep in mind these undervolting quick tests tell you nothing about stability in long term use.
Or you know, they're just gonna compare it to their own product stack.
These stupid marketing ploys are pathetic. What if AMD delay by 2 days, will Nvidia delay again and they both play corporate leapfrog?
I suspect that the delay was mostly because the reviewers wouldn't be able to get the cards to publish the reviews on time, again.Was the review date delayed too?
Less people will want to buy 3070 once AMD shows their wares?Maybe it's not a marketing ploy and they really want to ramp up inventory. Though I don't get how waiting 2 weeks will help. It's still going to be the same total number of cards that make it to market whether it's a drip or a drop.
Surprisingly quite a few professional review sites include these models in their reviews.Getting desperate showing stuff that isn't games.
this guy speaks the truth, and unlike the "tech youtuber I am not gonna mention by name" -his words- he never jumped on the back of that theory. Igor the guy who came up with that theory also said that it was a possible cause. He could be wrong, but at least he offered a possible explanation 'cos he knows his stuff and it was interesting, but when a "I am cool know-it-all" like jayztwocents appeared for giving his unwanted, not knowledgeable opinion, the issue got a bit more complicated and drama ensued.
tldr: There's nothing wrong with the capacitor configurations. The new driver has the same performance, but eliminates crashes. The clock frequency vs voltage curve is nearly identical and power consumption is nearly identical. There were minor tweaks, probably in the boosting algorithm so it wouldn't change quite as rapidly. The linux driver was always stable. It was the windows driver that had crashing problems.
Who pays their bills though? There are barely any truly independent review sites. But there are differences in integrity.Surprisingly quite a few professional review sites include these models in their reviews.