Could bluetooth 2.1 be enough to send video signal to the DS4?. I supposse not as it is not even capable of sending a high quality sound signal.
Maybe DS4 is also wifi compatible for this.
Why would you send video signal to DS4?
Could bluetooth 2.1 be enough to send video signal to the DS4?. I supposse not as it is not even capable of sending a high quality sound signal.
Maybe DS4 is also wifi compatible for this.
Sorry, I don't understand the question. You need each eye to see a separate image, obviously. You can either have one screen per eye, like the existing HMZs, or you can have one large screen and separate it so each eye only sees half, as Oculus Rift does, if that answers your question. Oh, do you mean the parallax screen on 3DS? that won't work for a VR headset because it's placed too close to the eyes, I think. Has anyone positioned a 3DS screen 5" in front of their face and tested?Does it have to be one screen per eye?
Or could it be 2 layered screens a la 3DS?
I wonder which would be better.
I'm glad this is optional... the more I think about it, the more expensive it sounds...
Why would you send video signal to DS4?
This would replace the TV and may be PSEye. If the rumor is true, my office PS4 will be set up with this.
My 3DTV in the office went belly up.
I guess that's true actually, because if we move our eyes even slightly with a close screen, it would screw up the image.
With 3DS we are looking in the same direction more or less.
Unless it's a curved screen maybe?
The calibration might be a nightmare still, so 2 screens might be better anyway.
The only reason I wouldn't run away from my TV too fast is motion sickness lol.
Though it would be an interesting paradigm to have a headset replace the TV entirely...
It could be another disruptive technology if it really takes off with one of the consoles, who knows?
Maybe the answer to glasses-free-3DTV was not to get rid of the glasses, but to get rid of the TV?
It would be great if Sony also offered Oculus Rift support. It could potentially mean even greater adoption to have more options at buyer's disposal. I hope they stay true to the more open platform mantra, and it's not just applying to indie games.
That's the display currently used in the $1000 HMZ and also in Sony's very expensive digital viewfinder for its NEX range of cameras. If Sony go that route, it'll be very niche. They need a cheaper solution. Oculus Rift's approach is to mount a larger (7") screen from a tablet and use optics to turn it into a stereoscopic display. This would be by far the cheaper option. I presume that approach is going to be guarded by patents though.I'd hazard a random guess that we're looking at 720P .
http://www.androidauthority.com/worlds-highest-ppi-display-2098ppi-oled-display-sony-254182/
Without a shared screen like a TV, the downside is no local co-op and mp.
Unless they can send the second screen to a Vita. [Head explode. Too confusing... Just keep the freaking TV]
Sony is in good position to match Oculus Rift. Although frame rate will be a challenge. Carmack has already been talking about 120hz (240 stereoscopic frames).
What Sony should do is create a more powerful GPU version of the PS4 to allow for increased frame rates for stereoscopic gaming. Charge an extra $200 for it and call it PS4 Gemini. Push the Oculus Rift clone with the PS4 upgraded gpu.
That's the display currently used in the $1000 HMZ and also in Sony's very expensive digital viewfinder for its NEX range of cameras. If Sony go that route, it'll be very niche. They need a cheaper solution. Oculus Rift's approach is to mount a larger (7") screen from a tablet and use optics to turn it into a stereoscopic display. This would be by far the cheaper option. I presume that approach is going to be guarded by patents though.
What Sony should do is create a more powerful GPU version of the PS4 to allow for increased frame rates for stereoscopic gaming. Charge an extra $200 for it and call it PS4 Gemini. Push the Oculus Rift clone with the PS4 upgraded gpu.
Although they've recently announced the HMZ-T3, having a competing technology would appear weird...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/03/sony-new-hmz-t3-head-mounted-display-wireless-hands-on/
Looking around the web, the HMZ-T2 was shown at TGS 2012... maybe this device is simply the HMZ-T3?
Wrong link. You copied the HMZ-T2 reveal link.Although they've recently announced the HMZ-T3, having a competing technology would appear weird...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/03/sony-new-hmz-t3-head-mounted-display-wireless-hands-on/
Although they've recently announced the HMZ-T3, having a competing technology would appear weird...
http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/03/sony-new-hmz-t3-head-mounted-display-wireless-hands-on/
Looking around the web, the HMZ-T2 was shown at TGS 2012... maybe this device is simply the HMZ-T3?