New 3DMark03 Patch 330

[RussSchultz]

Well, there we go. Just a little misunderstanding.

/sarcasm

 

[Dave Baumann]

http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6222

 

[breez]

I wonder how reliable will 3DMark03 be in the future... Goodbye Futuremark!

I'm sorry.

 

[Unknown Soldier]

Was 3dmark03 out when the 23.11 drivers were released?

That's actually what i'm getting at(and no the drivers were released before 3DMark2k3). The drivers aren't tweaked to look for the 3DMark executable which shows you that 3DMark2003 actually is working 100% and shows that Nvidia and to an small extent ATI both are cheating with the drivers. The program is 100% fine and I believe should be used for future benchmarks.

Like someone said earlier, Nvidia are at 2 strikes, one more and they are out.

US

 

[Doomtrooper]

I wonder how reliable will 3DMark03 be in the future... Goodbye Futuremark!

I'm sorry.

Yep..dissappointing when the evidence is ummmm..indisputable, but I was truly hoping for a benchmark that wasn't biased or cheats allowed.

That will be the last time 3Dmark see my Hardrive also..

Optimizations:

Funny Shit...silly us..

 

[gokickrocks]

deleted post

 

[nelg]

Sharky uses 3Dmark03 v. 3.2
http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/videocards/article.php/3211_2216021__1

 

[Althornin]

Sharky uses 3Dmark03 v. 3.2
http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/videocards/article.php/3211_2216021__1

Yeah, and the Cat 3.2's.
Great review! (sarcasm)

 

[mczak]

Sharky uses 3Dmark03 v. 3.2
http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/videocards/article.php/3211_2216021__1

Yeah, and the Cat 3.2's.
Great review! (sarcasm)

They also use old nvidia drivers - I think if that review would have been published 2 weeks earlier it wouldn't look that bad. It REALLY looks like it was written 2-3 weeks ago... (though I've no idea why you'd want to publish it NOW unchanged).

 

[John Reynolds]

Crap! I've ran more benchmarks for just one game than that entire review used. That is one seriously cookie-cutter review. :?