Comedy is now illegal againOh wow, this is just pure brilliance... Total meltdown by a spoiled brat billionaire ...
Solid followup:
Comedy is now illegal againOh wow, this is just pure brilliance... Total meltdown by a spoiled brat billionaire ...
Solid followup:
That's the secret of his successi heard elon musk eats doody
The cull hit the marketing department hard, took two-thirds of the design department, and maybe 75 percent of managers. Content moderation was somewhat spared, with a layoff rate of only 15 percent, according to Yoel Roth, head of safety at the platform.
...
"People would find out not by any phone call or any email... but just by seeing their work laptop automatically reboot and just to go blank," Emmanuel Cornet, a French engineer who had been at Twitter for a year and a half, told AFP on Friday.
Yup, they're now "efficiency experts" lolz.how he brought in some people from Tesla to review Twitter's employees and decide who to axe:
I don't think Twitter will be around in a year at this rate.The real question is what twitter becomes a year from now or two years from now.
Oh please , much ado about nothing.I don't think Twitter will be around in a year at this rate.
You have that backwards. It's the Twitter platform that makes money off having verified personalities using the platform to draw in everyone else. Without those personas no one would use that platform.I also find it hilarious that people who make money off having verified twitter accounts are mad that they now have to pay for that verification.
You have that backwards. It's the Twitter platform that makes money off having verified personalities using the platform to draw in everyone else. Without those personas no one would use that platform.
Just an FYI this parody account thing has been in the TOS for years now. You can have a parody account but there are rules you have to follow to have oneUgh! After spending way too much time looking into Musk's Twitter fiasco I'm wondering just wtf is up. I thought he banned Kathy because she was the only one who did that, but it turns out a whole bunch of people did including other celebrities and none of them have been perma-banned. If there's one thing I learned in my years of foruming it's that selective enforcement is a great key to community success, it's like a bedrock principle that users love and respect!
Also remember a week ago when he threatened a bunch of employees that they'd be fired if they didn't get his project up and running by today? Yeah it turns out they're delaying that until after the elections and the project was the whole $7.99/mos for the blue check...which as so many pointed out just isn't working at all. There's a pretty good Raw Story article that has most of the juicy details, I include a snippet about the lay-offs and how he brought in some people from Tesla to review Twitter's employees and decide who to axe:
So are you saying you feel that Musk fairly applied that policy in this case?Just an FYI this parody account thing has been in the TOS for years now. You can have a parody account but there are rules you have to follow to have one
I'd have to look at every case in order to say either way. One I am aware of is Ethan klein who certainly broke TOS. Same with Kathy griffon . They didn't follow the parody account rules and were banned.So are you saying you feel that Musk fairly applied that policy in this case?
Sarah Silverman and Valerie Bertinelli also impersonated Musk and neither were perma-banned. That's the bit I mean about selective enforcement.I'd have to look at every case in order to say either way. One I am aware of is Ethan klein who certainly broke TOS. Same with Kathy griffon . They didn't follow the parody account rules and were banned.
The apps episode? I do not see the similarities at all, this is about paying to play rather than a "free speech platform". The blue marks weren't a status indicator, they were an identifier of verified accounts. Paying to be able to make a verified account doesn't seem to really verify anything except someone being dumb enough to give Twitter monies.I find it hilarious that many of these protests are upset because they wont have a special status of blue check marks. Now anyone can pay to have the privilege and they are all butt hurt . It reminds me of the mew mew beans episode of community.
Sarah Silverman and Valerie Bertinelli also impersonated Musk and neither were perma-banned. That's the bit I mean about selective enforcement.
The apps episode? I do not see the similarities at all, this is about paying to play rather than a "free speech platform". The blue marks weren't a status indicator, they were an identifier of verified accounts. Paying to be able to make a verified account doesn't seem to really verify anything except someone being dumb enough to give Twitter monies.
Yes the crazy person who thinks its hilarious that grown ass adults are getting upset cause others can buy blue colored check marks ? That people are upset when the platform holder can simply ban then for whatever they want like the platform holder has been doing since the inception of the site but now that they are the ones getting banned its an issue ?I linked an article above about the multiple abusers, and we're just gonna have to agreee to disagree again because you're sounding like a crazy person to me.
You realize it's a small part of the larger outrage over him trying expecting people to approve of him turning Twitter into a subscription based service and his general bungling of the takeover as well as his ineptitude at trying to act like a human?Yes the crazy person who thinks its hilarious that grown ass adults are getting upset cause others can buy blue colored check marks ? That people are upset when the platform holder can simply ban then for whatever they want like the platform holder has been doing since the inception of the site but now that they are the ones getting banned its an issue ?
Then they should have bought twitter and ran it the way they wanted too ? Or perhaps they should now go and start their own twitter ?You realize it's a small part of the larger outrage over him trying expecting people to approve of him turning Twitter into a subscription based service and his general bungling of the takeover as well as his ineptitude at trying to act like a human?