Why? He's easily the most popular at the moment out of all of them.
Why? He's easily the least expensive at the moment out of all of them.
Why? He's easily the most popular at the moment out of all of them.
Why? He's easily the least expensive at the moment out of all of them.
That's an assumption based on how big some of them were.
To pay this cast in the '80s, you would have had to cough up everything you owned. How did you go about paying them now? Was it a lot of favours being called in?
Sylvester Stallone: A lot of it was calling in [laughs]. I could never afford Bruce [Willis] and Arnold [Schwarzenegger] in the same movie! That would have been the whole budget of the movie. Jason's a lot of money, but well worth £100 a week!
Yeah, I believe that Stathams salary was much higher than anyone else's, but I'm a bit puzzled how that has happened - I've missed how he became such a big star.
I.e. Arnie, Willis and Lundgren might have done it a bit as a 'favour' to Stallone and just a way to do something cool with all these great action 'actors' (to use the term loosely), hence not requiring much in the way of cash (especially Arnie who was a cameo), whereas Statham is not Stallone's friend and was actually 'employed' and paid according to what he usually gets.
The first trailer seem to have given the entire story away, so either they have another twist up their sleeve or it's just that well executed... I'm interested either way.
Let the Right One In-
9.6/10
With the advent of a remake here (Let Me In), I decided to rent the original Swedish vampire movie. It's without a doubt the best vampire movie I've ever seen. And it didn't take a gross budget and a plethora of special effects to maintain a solid story and great performances from the actors. Although I'm hesitant to see the remake, regardless of the fact that it scored rather high on Rottentomatoes.com, I'll probably catch it this weekend.
Brothers - 9/10 - Blu-ray
I talk about the plot in my review, so there are spoilers. Really fantastic movie, loved it, despite wanting to turn away from the screen or turn it off at some points because of the emotions.
The trailers for this movie when it was about to be released had me interested and provided the hook, but they didn't prepare me to be blown away by how good it was. There's so much extra in the movie that the trailer doesn't expose, and it's the first film in a while where I've felt genuinely uncomfortable watching it due to the voyeurism on such a horrible, private subject matter (Sam's time in Afghanistan, and his family grieving).
Watching Sam's dark descent was hard, and you could honestly see it in the guy's eyes that he was completely on the edge and really struggling to hold it all together. It was a truly great performance from an actor I previously thought couldn't act for toffee.
Then you have Tommy and Grace's side of things (and the dad, who I thought was terrific) which was compelling too (I think they're both very good on screen together). Watching Tommy turn into this really good person and help Grace grieve and support her and the kids was really tender.
Then it all comes together in the 2nd part of the film where all the relationships are played out, including some cracking screen presence from the older daughter character, and things unwind to an edge-of-your-seat climax where Sam really loses it.
The only reason I don't give it a 10 is because I haven't seen the original, and I'd like to before I call out which one I think is the better treatment of the subject matter. It's supposed to be terrific too.
Original?