Great, now you play the victim... Is that another nasty role-play shit of yours? Stop it!OMG I'M INNOCENT IN ALL THIS!!!! I'm the victim here!
Great, now you play the victim... Is that another nasty role-play shit of yours? Stop it!OMG I'M INNOCENT IN ALL THIS!!!! I'm the victim here!
I want to second this one.For a solid sleeper action hit, check out Nobody. Think Saul Goodman turn John Wick.
Watched this last night.After somewhat enjoying the previous Monarch monster movies for what they were, I really did not enjoy Godzilla vs Kong at all. The storyline was just stupid in every aspect but that's often needing to be overshadowed by the monster fight scenes, as you would hope. However, those scenes weren't impressive either and did not contain the sense of scale or dread of the previous movies. I think camera angles played a big part with lack of scale.
The overall speed of the monsters belied their size, I think they moved too fast and agile that what I previously enjoyed. Additionally, the scenes were too brightly lit and lacked some of the obscurity which really help sell the scenes previously. Especially Hong Kong which was full of colored lighting everywhere. The combination made the fight scenes look and feel like something from Power Rangers.
How do ghosts giggle?omg its almost midnight here and im giggling like a ghost
Do you watch Pitch Meetings? EnjoyPlot was terribly nonsensical from start to finish.
So I watched Tenet last night and maybe I just wasn’t in the mood but quite honestly I have never sat through something I understood less than this movie, ever.
Have you noticed the site you've been hanging around the last 20 years actually is about 3D graphics?
Sorry.
Obligatory topic related content: Thunder Force has to be the biggest turkey ever with such cast. Ben Falcone & Melissa McCarthy - stamp of quality.
I watched Tenet and understood what they were going for right off, it's just they kept breaking all their own rules about how it worked and continuity and such.So I watched Tenet last night and maybe I just wasn’t in the mood but quite honestly I have never sat through something I understood less than this movie, ever.
Watched a YouTube video or two and I get it now but I must say, this one was a big miss from Nolan.
Also, had to watch with subtitles cause I couldn’t understand a word they were saying. And I still found it hard to follow.
Meh.
I watched Tenet and understood what they were going for right off, it's just they kept breaking all their own rules about how it worked and continuity and such.
If you have time travel in a movie it HAS to obey the rules, otherwise it's just a deus ex machina. Tenet wasn't even that, it was a bad joke.
Sure, FAQ about Time Travel got it pretty accurate. If you're talking about Tenet then the whole "matter moving backwards through time" thing doesn't work and they use it paradoxically throughout the movie.
its pretty hard to grasp, but oddly enough if you use a spreadsheet it makes sense.Oh my god that whole thing about the inverted bullets made ZERO sense
So what happens if you have a shit ?
its pretty hard to grasp, but oddly enough if you use a spreadsheet it makes sense.
time 0: walking 1 metre to my car
time 1: starting my car
time 2: driving to hotel
time 3: unpacking luggage
time 4: going to airport
time 5: flying to country:
time 6: landing in country
time 7: shuttle to tenet inversion place
time 8: walk through inversion place
(now we are advancing the storyline forward, backwards through time)
time 7: shooting a gun at wall
time 6: bullet hits the wall
time 5: bullets explode against wall
etc and so forth.
Now that all of the forward and backwards is written out, now you have to play both timelines at the time same
so now we have
time 5: I'm simultaneously flying to a country while the bullets are exploding from a cement wall
time 6: landing in the country, the bullet just hits the wall
time 7: shuttling now to the tenet inversion place, the bullet is now flying back into the gun
time 8: I meet at the time inversion place and stare at my other self on the other side.
ie Tenet deals with 2 forms of time inversion, where most movies deal with going back in time once. Tenet adds 1 additional layer, which is that you cannot just jump back in time. Time is like a VCR tape, you rewind backwards or play forwards. But even though you are reversing the tape or playing it forward (ie, the inversion machines) there is 1 ultimately timeline that is still overseeing it all (the viewers timeline), and that is always playing forward (as the viewer watches the movie in both forward and reverse and forward again from where the movie reversed)
Most movies when they go back in time, you jump back to a part of the movie and play forward. Tenet has that weird part where it's not allowed to just jump back in time and play forward. It's VCR reversing back into time and in order to go forward in time, you must step through the inversion machine to play forward again, and then you are now playing forward but back in time.
Lol. It’s a bit of a mirror effect at the moment of the gun shot.Still doesn’t make sense. The bullet was shot from another gun and is “inverted”. Ok fair enough. Yet they pick it up and play with it like normal, and it shoots back into a gun that was never there in the bullet’s timeline.
So it’s inverted only when convenient, ie when it needs to look cool that it shoots backward into a gun that isn’t inverted? Makes no sense and you can’t convince me otherwise.