Matt-IGN to reveal some Revolution technical specs tonight ?

Discussion in 'Console Technology' started by Megadrive1988, Mar 30, 2006.

  1. function

    function None functional
    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    5,854
    Likes Received:
    4,410
    Location:
    Wrong thread
    Say this was a 3 day early April fools joke. If the actual clocks were 2x faster instead of 1.5, would that really make such a difference? Not compared to the PS3, 360, and PC, no.

    If the Rev is based on some kind of DX9 capable chip, why wouldn't dev kits have DX9 capable chips in them?

    I reckon it's odds on that this article, like the RAM figures released before them, aren't far from the truth. Nintendo really aren't playing the power game against the 360 and PS3, just like the DS wasn't playing the power game against the PSP.
     
  2. mrdarko

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    england
    You're proberly right.

    I bet if he's wrong about these spec's,he'd wish it was!
     
  3. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242

    I didn't see anything about Hollywood having twice as many pixel pipelines as Flipper.

    *original Flipper @ 202.5 MHz = 810 Mpixels/sec
    *final downgraded Flipper @ 162 MHz = 648 Mpixels/sec
    *current Hollywood @ 243 MHz = 972 Mpixels/sec
    (a TINY bit more than Xbox's NV2A and not even a full friggin' gigapixel of fillrate)


    Flipper and Hollywood, if IGN specs are true: 1 DX7-class T&L unit / geometry engine,

    4 pixel pipelines, 1 "super texture unit", not per pixel pipe, but 1 for the entire GPU... this is the TEV unit.

    Hollywood seems to be roughly 50% more powerful than Flipper....not even 2x
     
    #23 Megadrive1988, Mar 30, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2006
  4. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242
    geee, the ArtX guys didn't do much of anything for Nintendo this time.....

    the ArtX/ATI R300 ~ Radeon 9700 Pro from 2002 would kick the ever living crap out of Hollywood, if indeed the specs reported for Hollywood by IGN are true.


    if nothing has been added to Hollywood over Flipper, then Hollywood is late 1990s technology, since Flipper was designed in 1998-1999, and Broadway is 90s tech as well, then.
     
    #24 Megadrive1988, Mar 30, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2006
  5. mckmas8808

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,744
    Likes Received:
    28
    This is just horrible. I understand that Mario doesn't need 100,000 polys but come on Nintendo! Does Nintendo understand that people loved the way Ratchet and Clank looked on the PS3 at GDC?

    Well even if they did see it, it doesn't matter now because it's too late.
     
  6. Teasy

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Newcastle
    What Hollywood specs?
     
    #26 Teasy, Mar 30, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2006
  7. Ooh-videogames

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2002
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    1
    Like I said, just doubling things up for the hell of it.
     
  8. Ooh-videogames

    Regular

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2002
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    1
    True, I wonder why the lack of anyother info. Wouldn't most devs have this info already ie.(pixel pipelines, texel units, memory bandwidth). But in the article don't seem to have knowledge of whether or not the GPU will have shader capabilities.
     
  9. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242

    why? that would now be OVER-estimating Revolution specs. why would you double the pixel pipelines and everything?

    I'll bet that also means Hollywood does not have any added pixel pipes, texture units or geometry engines/ T&L units. which MIGHT prove to be wrong, but I highly doubt Hollywood is more than faster Flipper, and faster only by clockspeed, not architectural additions. I would LOVE to be wrong though.

    Hollywood = Flipper with 50 percent more clockspeed, not triple the power, not even double the power.

    50 percent more power.

    I can now say WOW
     
    #29 Megadrive1988, Mar 30, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 30, 2006
  10. mckmas8808

    Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,744
    Likes Received:
    28
    Maybe they do know and just didn't tell Matt that particular info for some reason. *shrugs*
     
  11. Teasy

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Messages:
    4,563
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Which of course fits the "totally new design" that ATI talked about perfectly right?..
     
  12. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242

    I think ATI was talking about Hollywood being a totally new design from PC GPUs, which Flipper already is.
     
  13. blakjedi

    Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,985
    Likes Received:
    88
    Location:
    20001
    In a lot of ways I read this news and say "why bother?" Its almost like a marginal improvement just to include a DVD drive.

    I read this news as the last gasps of a dying (in HW terms) giant. This is nintendos last console. They should probably just focus on software and handhelds... they're back library alone is worth billions... If Sony and MS can start to capture the child markets (ratchet and clank and viva pinata efforts come to mind) its gonna really be over.
     
  14. scooby_dooby

    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    8,563
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    E-town, Alberta
    Well he says it's based on an extension of the flipper architecture, that could mean alot more than just a higher clockspeed.
     
  15. scooby_dooby

    Legend

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    8,563
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    E-town, Alberta
    Form factor? Consumer perception (i.e. hot new gadget)? 100% install base for the new controller?
     
  16. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242

    yes I know -- so I am holding out hope that *I* am wrong, and will be able to enjoy a delicious plate full of CROW.


    mmmmm crow, I would like to eat some right now :/
     
  17. McHuj

    Veteran Subscriber

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    869
    Location:
    Texas
    So if these specs are true, a $149 price point wouldn't be out of the question?
     
  18. compres

    Regular

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Germany
    I would not predict the fate of a company based on rumours.
     
  19. Megadrive1988

    Veteran

    Joined:
    May 30, 2002
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    242
    well, whether Revolution is a 1.5x, 2x or even 3x leap over Gamecube, I do hope that Nintendo's next-next generation HDTV console is the leap over Revolution in power that Gamecube was over Nintendo 64.


    with that said, I still end up getting at least one Revolution this year, maybe two. I'm not actually biased, I own all the major consoles.
     
  20. turkish a. punkass

    Newcomer

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    ... or maybe they will surprise us all by throwing in a 3rd processor (possibly physics)... hey, one can hope!

    after all, it doesn't say anything about overall system power or design. just clock speed of cpu and gpu.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Beyond3D has been around for over a decade and prides itself on being the best place on the web for in-depth, technically-driven discussion and analysis of 3D graphics hardware. If you love pixels and transistors, you've come to the right place!

    Beyond3D is proudly published by GPU Tools Ltd.
Loading...