RTX2060S it is
Is everything a contest with you? We get it, you dislike PS5. I enjoy PC gaming, but I'm not 24/7 shitting on console gaming, or one particular platform in your case. Please just stop, and be more constructive to the conversation.
RTX2060S it is
Is everything a contest with you? We get it, you dislike PS5. I enjoy PC gaming, but I'm not 24/7 shitting on console gaming, or one particular platform in your case. Please just stop, and be more constructive to the conversation.
going offtopic.
If it is the same IPC than RDNA1, it is a bit better than 2080 in rasterizing performance or maybe better than this if RDNA2 has a little enhancement from RDNA1 but the Raytracing performance is maybe not as good as Turing and maybe here more comparable to a 2060 Super or a 2070. At least in Tflops side, the PS5 will maybe perform under this because of a lack of memory bandwidth.
448 GB/s for the shared CPU and GPU Yikes. This is the weakness of PS5 and the first shock seeing the spec. It reminds me the PS4 Pro, 16 Gbps module and 512 GB/s would have been much better.
After we will have multiplatform games with raytracing and some without raytracing. We will be able to compare at launch the performance.
Likely it's just out of reach here. Consoles thrive on price performance, but more importantly those finalized price points have a limit. It does appear they are already both taking losses to keep to their $499 price points.Yep. Bandwidth is easily the thing I least like about both consoles. Everything else is solid, but not the bandwidth.
I would have much preferred the PS5 to go with 16GB of 16gbps GDDR6, and the XSX to go with 20GB of 14gbps. And then 16GB of 14gbps GDDR6 for the XSS with exactly half the GPU performance of the XSX.
Meh, it is what it is.
What is so wrong with a RTX2070 in comparison? Its you that assumes thats a bad performance product? It's what DF thinks, and i think its about right. Shitting on everything that DF or others have to say isnt much better anyway, just because it doesnt fit ones likings.
One thinks the PS5 gpu is better then a 2080 and closing in on 2080S/Ti, i think its closer to a RTX2060S or 2070. Its different opinions, try to live with that, and take your complaints elsewhere instead of going offtopic.
Likely it's just out of reach here. Consoles thrive on price performance, but more importantly those finalized price points have a limit. It does appear they are already both taking losses to keep to their $499 price points.
Don't pretend you don't know what you do here. You're not that stupid and neither is everyone else.
But if you're genuinely oblivious to your general tone, I will say that everyone here would benefit from you partaking in some self reflection. 9 times out of 10, when I click on "show ignored posts" I see what you've written and just roll my eyes. There are plenty of other posters on this forum who primarily or exclusively play on PC or XBox, and don't elicit that response. Hence them not being on my tiny ignore list.
Just... come on. We're here to have enjoyable conversations, not constantly jostle.
well it's still incredible value. I've opted to pass on the 3080, and pick up the PS5 + XSX at the same price of a 3080.Yeah, true. We're already getting RT and SSD's, which is so much more than I was expecting, so I won't whinge... much.
I think its closer to a rtx 2070 in that department. A 2070 is close to 10TF in reality.
I dont think the 448gb/s is such a huge problem?
well it's still incredible value. I've opted to pass on the 3080, and pick up the PS5 + XSX at the same price of a 3080.
It's honestly hard to find that type of value.
I don't mind that people talk about PC/XSX/PS5 as in it's technical raw numbers that's actually what I enjoy talking about, but if we're getting subjective, it's hard for me to believe someone would be upset for what you get price/performance for either console and launching with Ray Traced games; though I always understand the desire for more. The situation on console is not perfect but it's damn good still and there is some expectation that console developers will find a way to make it work for the hardware if they really need something to work.
I compare with spec, if you have no chance at lottery it will be less than this. PS5 looks like base spec of 2080 and Xbox Series X is between 2080 Super and 2080 Ti same with base spec.
Here we go! DF ANALYSIS
I'm on 2080Ti system already, so it will be PS5 + PC again. In your situation yes thats a value much better then going for a single GPU over two complete systems + you get the PS5 exclusives, controllers etc.
Exactly this.
Lottery? I seriously hope your right though, as it would up the ante for base level performance for PC gamers, as consoles set the baseline usually. Because, basically, a 2080 is a 2018 product and compared to RTX3000 and RDNA2, in raw numbers, not as impressive anymore as two years ago.
I see PS5 GPU perfoming atleast what a 5700XT does, probably higher then that. Cant wait to do my own comparisons, too bad im on a 2080Ti, will need to find a used 2070/2080 or something.
We will know soon enough i guess, as tech channels like DF will do some side by sides. Also, i assume console games still are optimized better, lifting it above the direct spec to spec equal pc gpu.
And, i think RT performance is the most important somewhere.... I mean, about all PS5 games showed have some form of RT going on, and i doubt going forward that will decrease. Its RT performance is very okay to me so far, GT7, Stray, MM, this magnata game etc.
Oh but i understand what you mean, its just that im seeing the same postings from (some) PS fans..... Its easy for you to not notice that when a post is not negatively impacting your platform of choice.
Things work counteractive on forums and discussions. NV announces RTX IO, and that resulted in rather many downplaying posts against that. MS announces cross gen, damn what a mess that got, etc. Or the MS buying a large studio, as late as today i see people downplaying that.
Im not saying your doing it, but some do. I understand the problem, but see it from the other side too.
On that, i think a 2070 level performance seems about right, theres no reason for anyone to get offended about that.
Fair points. I've certainly noticed it with one or two PlayStation fanboys (who have made their way onto my ignore list.) Reading their posts is like getting sand in my underpants.
Anyway, I won't derail things any more.
xoxoxo
Is everything a contest with you? We get it, you dislike PS5. I enjoy PC gaming, but I'm not 24/7 shitting on console gaming, or one particular platform in your case. Please just stop, and be more constructive to the conversation.
Interestingly RT hardware should be nice for empty space skipping for solutions like in UE5. (Especially on consoles as you should be able to write custom traversal code etc.)And UE 5 demo doesn't have triangle RT at all. I think we will see GI solution using non triangle RT solution like Voxel, being point based and RT being use for example only on reflections or shadows.
EDIT: And probably the reason Mark Cerny told GI is cheaper than RT shadows or RT reflection. This is the most expensive effect with triangle raytracing.